2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2012.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying CFSE label decay in flow cytometry data

Abstract: We developed a series of models for the label decay in cell proliferation assays when the intracellular dye carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) is used as a staining agent. Data collected from two healthy patients were used to validate the models and to compare the models with the Akiake Information Criteria. The distinguishing features of multiple decay rates in the data are readily characterized and explained via time dependent decay models such as the logistic and Gompertz models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gompertz decay). Such rates are consistent with the sequence of chemical reactions known to occur during the labelling process [18]. If data are not collected in the first day after labelling with CFSE (as in the data collected for this report) then, as we shall see below, exponential decay is sufficient.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling Of Cfse Datasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Gompertz decay). Such rates are consistent with the sequence of chemical reactions known to occur during the labelling process [18]. If data are not collected in the first day after labelling with CFSE (as in the data collected for this report) then, as we shall see below, exponential decay is sufficient.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling Of Cfse Datasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This follows the convention of [4], in which the authors assume that an exponential decay model is su cient to describe decay of CFSE in experiments for which the rst data collection time occurs after approximately 24 hours. We note that the decay of intracellular CFSE has been observed to occur very rapidly during the rst 24 hours after initial labeling and much slower thereafter [6,22] and that this observation can be fully supported with molecular-level modeling [1]. Thus, when data are collected in the rst 24 hours, it is more accurate to describe the rate of loss of uorescence intensity with a time-varying rate, as in a Gompertz decay model.…”
Section: Parameterization For a Speci C Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, a random and uneven partition of mass between the sister cells is considered as an axiom in cell biology since many years (10). Although the detailed knowledge of the intracellular reactions which affect the turnover and intracellular heterogeneity of CFSE labeled proteins is currently limited (11), it is broadly accepted that CFSE binds indiscriminately to intracellular proteins and the fluorescence intensity of any single cell is roughly proportional to the total number of CFSE molecules bound to proteins within that cell (12). The latter study proposed a method for the analysis of CFSE-labeling experiments which also considered the possibility of an unequal division of CFSE molecules between the daughter cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%