2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth – A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
189
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
7
189
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Slash removal has larger effects on soil C and nutrients when rotations are short, slash is removed repeatedly, clay content is low, temperatures are high, the site is relatively wet, and forest productivity is high [4,5]. It is well known that retaining harvest residues on the soil is extremely important to maintain high productivity of tropical forests [14][15][16]. However, more research is needed in order to reach a plausible conclusion about the subject due to the divergence in the data available, as observed by Nambiar and Harwood [14].…”
Section: Effects Of Harvest Residue Strategies On Soil C and Availablmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Slash removal has larger effects on soil C and nutrients when rotations are short, slash is removed repeatedly, clay content is low, temperatures are high, the site is relatively wet, and forest productivity is high [4,5]. It is well known that retaining harvest residues on the soil is extremely important to maintain high productivity of tropical forests [14][15][16]. However, more research is needed in order to reach a plausible conclusion about the subject due to the divergence in the data available, as observed by Nambiar and Harwood [14].…”
Section: Effects Of Harvest Residue Strategies On Soil C and Availablmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of leaving forest residues on site can sustain soil quality with respect to the productivity of medium and long-term species such as Eucalyptus [12][13][14][15][16]. This practice helps to improve nutrient pools and OM content in the soil [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson, 1994;Ballard, 2000;Smaill et al, 2008), or soil microbial community biomass and activity (Smaill et al, 2010;Achat et al, 2015). Integration of this additional data would likely also see more variations arise between the different growth trajectories based on other regional differences.…”
Section: Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the sustainability of harvesting forest biomass has been questioned, since it may affect soil fertility, water quality, carbon balance, and biological diversity [2]. A possible decline in forest productivity, which would be caused by the removal of nutrient-rich biomass, likely represents the most important of these concerns [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide reviews indicate that WTH may deplete soil nutrients and carbon pools, and impair long-term forest productivity [4,5], thereby bolstering arguments against biomass harvesting. Indeed, WTH is not a nutrient-efficient strategy for harvesting biomass, as it also removes nutrient-rich twigs and leaves that only represent a small fraction of tree biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%