2009
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01022-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Differences in the Tempo of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype Evolution

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity, due to its high evolutionary rate, has long been identified as a main cause of problems in the development of an efficient HIV-1 vaccine. However, little is known about differences in evolutionary rate between different subtypes. In this study, we collected representative samples of the main epidemic subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs), namely, subsubtype A1, subtypes B, C, D, and G, and CRFs 01_AE and 02_AG. We analyzed separate data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
74
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
74
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first introduction was dated to 1978 which is one of the earliest estimates in Europe (Hue et al, 2005;Tebit and Arts, 2011). Our dating is plausible since it represents a date nine years after the estimated introduction of HIV-1 in the USA and was further supported by our evolutionary rate estimate since it was within the range of previously reported rates of the polymerase gene region in subtype B (Abecasis et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2007;Hue et al, 2005). HET has remained low since the first recorded case in Iceland, the proportion of HET in transmission clusters was found to be higher than MSM over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The first introduction was dated to 1978 which is one of the earliest estimates in Europe (Hue et al, 2005;Tebit and Arts, 2011). Our dating is plausible since it represents a date nine years after the estimated introduction of HIV-1 in the USA and was further supported by our evolutionary rate estimate since it was within the range of previously reported rates of the polymerase gene region in subtype B (Abecasis et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2007;Hue et al, 2005). HET has remained low since the first recorded case in Iceland, the proportion of HET in transmission clusters was found to be higher than MSM over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The estimated evolutionary rates were 2.81 (95% HPD, 2.42 to 3.22) ϫ 10 Ϫ3 and 1.81 (1.46 to 2.15) ϫ 10 Ϫ3 substitutions/site/year for CRF01_AE and subtype B, respectively. The results were essentially similar to those previously estimates for CRF01_AE and subtype B (31,36,37).…”
Section: Hiv-1 Genotype Distribution In Tokyo-kanagawa Areas 2004 -2supporting
confidence: 81%
“…36 We used a previously published normal prior to the time of the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of subtype A1 (1,954.2), with 95% Bayesian credible intervals (1,939.7-1,967.7). 37 Analyses of 250 million MCMC generations were performed in duplicate. Evolutionary parameters were sampled every 50,000 generations and a total of 5,000 posterior trees were retrieved.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%