2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying fast optical signal and event-related potential relationships during a visual oddball task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further detail about the task paradigm and experimental protocol can be found in [43], where data from sessions 1 and 2 of each participant were previously used in the analysis of the temporal and spectral relationships between FOS and ERP responses.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further detail about the task paradigm and experimental protocol can be found in [43], where data from sessions 1 and 2 of each participant were previously used in the analysis of the temporal and spectral relationships between FOS and ERP responses.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion artifacts were removed from DC intensity data using independent component analysis (ICA) as described in [43]. Phase data were corrected for phase wrapping and referenced to the medial NIRS channel C3 of the respective wavelength.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased EROS activity in occipital cortex under the match condition than under the mismatch condition was observed at 224 ms in Experiment 2. The temporal correspondence of ERP and EROS responses has been confirmed in the Go-NoGo (Medvedev et al, 2010), oddball (Proulx et al, 2018;Tse et al, 2013), and language processing tasks (Huang et al, 2013). Although we intended to align the EROS response with the N2pc, the activation in the occipital cortex might reflected a different process with the N2pc.…”
Section: The Different Patterns Of Representation Reactivation Before...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A prior power analysis, conducted with G*Power 3.1 (power = 0.95, α = .01), indicated that a sample of eight participants was required. According to previous EEG‐EROS studies (Huang et al., 2013; Proulx et al., 2018), 15 participants were sufficient to detect differences between two conditions. Twenty participants with normal or corrected‐to‐normal vision and normal color vision were recruited for each experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation