2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying gross mineralisation of P in dead soil organic matter: Testing an isotopic dilution method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculating the mineralization of non-living organic P from soil respiration in the soils studied by Achat et al (2009a) confirmed that gross organic P mineralization was mainly related to microbial immobilization (93%). This proportion was even higher (97%) when estimated using the change in the specific activity of the combined pools of water-extractable phosphate and microbial P over time (Achat et al, 2010a). Bünemann et al (2012) likewise found a dominance of microbial P immobilization when measuring gross and net organic P mineralization rates in a non-P-fertilized grassland soil with a large fumigant-labile P pool (36 mg P kg À1 ) and a very low concentration of phosphate in the soil solution (0.1 mg P kg À1 ).…”
Section: Assessing Microbial P Turnover and Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Calculating the mineralization of non-living organic P from soil respiration in the soils studied by Achat et al (2009a) confirmed that gross organic P mineralization was mainly related to microbial immobilization (93%). This proportion was even higher (97%) when estimated using the change in the specific activity of the combined pools of water-extractable phosphate and microbial P over time (Achat et al, 2010a). Bünemann et al (2012) likewise found a dominance of microbial P immobilization when measuring gross and net organic P mineralization rates in a non-P-fertilized grassland soil with a large fumigant-labile P pool (36 mg P kg À1 ) and a very low concentration of phosphate in the soil solution (0.1 mg P kg À1 ).…”
Section: Assessing Microbial P Turnover and Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Soil samples were spiked with 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg P kg À1 soil (as K 2 HPO 4 , replicated 3 times) and recovery of P was measured in the extracts colorimetrically using the ammonium molybdateestannous chloride reagent (Olsen and Sommers, 1982). We used linear or power equations to describe the relationship between P added and P recovered in the extracts (Morel et al, 1996;Achat et al, 2010).…”
Section: Measurements and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microbial P we did not correct for extraction efficiency, but accounted for P adsorption of microbial P during fumigation and extraction using the P-addition-recovery relationships measured for both soil types (Morel et al, 1996). An increase in microbial P in the extracts also affects the level of radioactivity of the extractable inorganic P (iP) because of sorption of P (including 32 P) to the solid phase and because of a change in the equilibrium between the radioactivity of iP and P bound to the solid phase (Achat et al, 2010). To correct for the net effect of both processes, 10 g of fresh soil was spiked with 4 KBq carrier-free 32 P and 0.12 mg unlabelled P (as K 2 HPO 4 , 12 mg kg À1 , replicated 3 times) mimicking microbial P release during fumigation (Achat et al, 2010).…”
Section: Measurements and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations