2019
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.031855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Importance of Major Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the impact of aging on cardiovascular risk is more severe in the presence of diabetes, with a transition from a low to a moderate 10-year CHD risk category at only 35 years of age in men and 45 years in women [39]. Thus, age represents a major determinant of the prognostic information included in all estimation risk models [36], whereas modifiable factors, such as body weight, play only a marginal role [22,40]. These considerations may explain our findings of raised CVD risk estimates after 5 years of treatment with Liraglutide, supporting a recent call for novel age-and sex-specific risk prediction models for the assessment of CVD [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the impact of aging on cardiovascular risk is more severe in the presence of diabetes, with a transition from a low to a moderate 10-year CHD risk category at only 35 years of age in men and 45 years in women [39]. Thus, age represents a major determinant of the prognostic information included in all estimation risk models [36], whereas modifiable factors, such as body weight, play only a marginal role [22,40]. These considerations may explain our findings of raised CVD risk estimates after 5 years of treatment with Liraglutide, supporting a recent call for novel age-and sex-specific risk prediction models for the assessment of CVD [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the identi cation of CVD risk factors seems to be relatively comprehensive, the precise and indirect mechanisms of the associated factors underlying CVD remains unclear (37). It is a critical gap since healthy behaviours lead to both reduced risk and more effective treatments (17,38). This is the rst study in the eld of CVD, to the best of our knowledge, that extensively examined the direct and indirect effects of comprehensive cardiovascular-related factors using BSEM in a population-based cohort platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the indirect effects of family history of CVD, age, lipid pro les, anthropometric indices, healthy lifestyle, quality of life, high-risk behaviours, having hypertension and high blood sugar on CVDs were not covered in the literature, many studies discussed the direct effect of such factors in which these results are in line with (9,11,12,15,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Causal networks evaluate causal relationships among variables beyond partial correlations and thus play a fundamental step in risk prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landmark analyses starting in 1987 identified certain key CVD risk factors and remarkably quickly these were standardised as age, gender, smoking, blood pressure, diabetes and cholesterol (later divided into total and high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol) . A multitude of additional CVD risk factors have since been described but all of these added little to the basic predictive model which is mostly driven by age, gender and ethnicity . Risk factor counting and set intervention levels were the basis of defining high‐risk patients for intervention.…”
Section: Suggested Data Transparency and Quality Assessment Criteria mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,7 A multitude of additional CVD risk factors have since been described but all of these added little to the basic predictive model which is mostly driven by age, gender and ethnicity. 8 Risk factor counting and set intervention levels were the basis of defining high-risk patients for intervention. These still persist in modern guidelines, for example, stage 2 hypertension or total cholesterol > 7.5mmol/L and more usefully the concept of two CVD risk factors predicting lifetime risk from age 55.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%