2012
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2012.684893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying inter-population variability in yellow perch sexual size dimorphism

Abstract: Size-selective angler behavior or the implementation of length-based regulations may have implications in harvest-oriented yellow perch (Perca flavescens) fisheries where perch populations may display sexual size dimorphism (SSD), even though the occurrence of SSD remains poorly documented. Predicted and observed mean lengths-at-age were used to describe the occurrence of yellow perch SSD in populations from four states and one Canadian province. In addition, abiotic and biotic variables were used to predict t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Letters indicates that means are significantly different at the P # 0.10 level. and attain greater lengths than males (Schoenebeck and Brown 2011;Uphoff and Schoenebeck 2012). The HSO regulation was designed to protect female walleye broodstock, and it has been successful in doing so, but because the population exhibits female-biased sexual size dimorphism males were not afforded the same protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Letters indicates that means are significantly different at the P # 0.10 level. and attain greater lengths than males (Schoenebeck and Brown 2011;Uphoff and Schoenebeck 2012). The HSO regulation was designed to protect female walleye broodstock, and it has been successful in doing so, but because the population exhibits female-biased sexual size dimorphism males were not afforded the same protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male and female median and average lengths were the same or similar for mesh sizes 32, 38, and 46 where the numbers of both sexes appeared statistically large enough to discern sexual differences. Thus, it appears that, despite the known dimorphic differences in growth (Purchase et al 2005;Uphoff & Schoenebeck 2013), any potential morphometric differences were not apparent in similar-sized fishes, regardless of sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Dead Lake, female Yellow Perch experience faster growth in all age groups compared with males. Sexspecific growth rates occurs in many fish species (e.g., Suwannee Bass Micropterus notius [Bonvechio et al 2005], Largemouth Bass M. salmoides [Schramm andSmith 1988, Walleye Sander vitreus [Henderson et al 2003]), including Yellow Perch (Uphoff and Schoenebeck 2012) and is usually related to spawning activities. However, Schoenebeck and Brown (2012) suggest sexspecific growth rates may result from other anaerobic activities (e.g., foraging for prey and predator avoidance) coupled with spawning activities of male Yellow Perch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%