2015
DOI: 10.1080/1573062x.2014.993999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying measuring errors of new residential water meters considering different customer consumption patterns

Abstract: 7Water meter measuring errors vary depending on the water flow rate. Therefore, the 8 discrepancy between the amount of water actually consumed and the volume registered by a 9 meter will differ depending on how water consumption is distributed by flow rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 also shows the ability of the manufacturers to produce meters with the same performance. Surprisingly, solid-state meters do not show any significant improvement in this respect to brand-new mechanical meters [ 26 ], especially when compared to oscillating piston meters. The tests conducted showed that meters of the same manufacturer can have an average measuring error throughout the tested range of more than 1.5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 also shows the ability of the manufacturers to produce meters with the same performance. Surprisingly, solid-state meters do not show any significant improvement in this respect to brand-new mechanical meters [ 26 ], especially when compared to oscillating piston meters. The tests conducted showed that meters of the same manufacturer can have an average measuring error throughout the tested range of more than 1.5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was based on three studies, two from the Gauteng region Taigbenu, 2016, 2019) and one from the Western Cape (Couvelis and Van Zyl, 2012a). The Western Cape was included as it provided representative data that aligned with international research better than the Gauteng data (Arregui et al, 2016). Also, the two datasets for the Gauteng data were from the same researchers, thus it was likely that the data source was the same.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted in Uganda reported a similar proportional consumption of 14% below 15 L/h and 25% below 35 L/h (Mutikanga et al, 2011b). However, international research reports lower figures of between 4.7% and 10% below 12 L/h and between 7.3% and 14.9% below 36 L/h (Arregui et al, 2016;Arregui et al, 2018a). This contrast can be attributed to an increased incidence of on-site leakage experienced in South Africa (Couvelis and Van Zyl, 2012a; Ncube and Taigbenu, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Sumrak et al () reported inconsistent test results below 0.25 gpm for mechanical meters, with only one model of ND meter consistently registering 80% or greater accuracy at ⅟ 16 gpm. Arregui, Balaguer, Soriano, and García‐Sierra () tested European SJ and OP meters in new condition and also found that RE varied the most between meter technologies at low flow rates (i.e., 0.25 gpm and below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Sumrak et al (2016) reported inconsistent test results below 0.25 gpm for mechanical meters, with only one model of ND meter consistently registering 80% or greater accuracy at 1 /16 gpm. Arregui, Balaguer, Soriano, and García-Sierra (2016) tested European SJ and OP meters in new condition and also found that RE varied the most between meter technologies at low flow rates (i.e., 0.25 gpm and below). Criminisi, Fontanazza, Freni, and La Loggia (2009) and Barfuss, Johnson, and Neilsen (2011) are among the few investigations studying the effects of service time (ST) and volumetric TP on meter performance, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%