2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28970-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying microstructures of earth materials using higher-order spatial correlations and deep generative adversarial networks

Abstract: The key to most subsurface processes is to determine how structural and topological features at small length scales, i.e., the microstructure, control the effective and macroscopic properties of earth materials. Recent progress in imaging technology has enabled us to visualise and characterise microstructures at different length scales and dimensions. However, one limitation of these technologies is the trade-off between resolution and sample size (or representativeness). A promising approach to this problem i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essential to the reconstruction of heterogeneous and complex microstructures is the determination of a representative image size (RES) that captures the structural elements of the system under consideration. Larger training images pose higher computational demands, while overly small images fail to fully capture material behavior and heterogeneity, resulting in the generation of pore artifacts and unrealistic shapes (Amiri et al, 2023). Hence, a RES analysis should be conducted for heterogeneous and complex samples to best determine an appropriate image size for training the model (Volkhonskiy et al, 2019;Costanza-Robinson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Representative Elementary Size (Res) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Essential to the reconstruction of heterogeneous and complex microstructures is the determination of a representative image size (RES) that captures the structural elements of the system under consideration. Larger training images pose higher computational demands, while overly small images fail to fully capture material behavior and heterogeneity, resulting in the generation of pore artifacts and unrealistic shapes (Amiri et al, 2023). Hence, a RES analysis should be conducted for heterogeneous and complex samples to best determine an appropriate image size for training the model (Volkhonskiy et al, 2019;Costanza-Robinson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Representative Elementary Size (Res) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the RES of our sample, we adopted the approach employed by Amiri et al (2023) which relies on the widely popular two-point correlation function, S 2 (r) (Torquato & Haslach Jr, 2002;Jiao et al, 2007Jiao et al, , 2008, defined as the probability, P , that two randomly selected points with a distance, r, fall within the same phase of interest (i), V i , in a d-dimensional space, R d (Yeong & Torquato, 1998):…”
Section: Representative Elementary Size (Res) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations