2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Morphology of Sands Using 3D Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it should be noted that the sphericity is defined for 2D images and hence differs from that defined for 3D images (Fonseca et al, 2012); for the former the measured values are between 0 and 1, with the upper limit for an ideally spherical shape, whereas for the latter the measured values can be greater than 1 and this is somehow odd. A detailed discussion of the differences between the two measurements of sphericity is outside the scope of this study; readers may refer to Alshibi et al (2014) and Fonseca et al (2012) for relevant details.…”
Section: Particle Shape Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it should be noted that the sphericity is defined for 2D images and hence differs from that defined for 3D images (Fonseca et al, 2012); for the former the measured values are between 0 and 1, with the upper limit for an ideally spherical shape, whereas for the latter the measured values can be greater than 1 and this is somehow odd. A detailed discussion of the differences between the two measurements of sphericity is outside the scope of this study; readers may refer to Alshibi et al (2014) and Fonseca et al (2012) for relevant details.…”
Section: Particle Shape Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with reduced a) is likely to fall through the same sieve aperture. For silica sand, Fonseca et al (2012) showed that the sieving measurements were closer to b, while Alshibli et al (2015) indicated a good agreement with a.…”
Section: Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 84%
“…This results in non-unique shape descriptors for a given grain, and significant differences between 2D and 3D shape indices have been previously reported (e.g. Fonseca et al, 2012;Alshibli et al, 2015). This paper presents for the first time in the literature a systematic and comprehensive 3D quantification of the morphology, including size and shape, and intra-granular void ratios of shelly carbonate sands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations