2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.125605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying nanoscale charge density features of contact-charged surfaces with an FEM/KPFM-hybrid approach

Abstract: Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) is a powerful tool for studying contact electrification (CE) at the nanoscale, but converting KPFM voltage maps to charge density maps is nontrivial due to long-range forces and complex system geometry. Here we present a strategy using finite-element method (FEM) simulations to determine the Green's function of the KPFM probe/insulator/ground system, which allows us to quantitatively extract surface charge. Testing our approach with synthetic data, we find that accounting f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the surface was neutralized (using positive charges) consequently lowering the surface potential to ≈−9.4 V. The subsequent negative charge injection cycles significantly increased the surface potential value in the negative regime to ≈−119.9 V. Last, positive charges were injected, to raise the surface potential to a value of +68.7 V. These charge states arose from the presence of trapped, uncompensated charges on the surface, and could easily be manipulated, and monitored, as shown here. [ 28 ] The associated charge densities could be harnessed to make more efficient triboelectric nanogenerator devices with still higher voltage outputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the surface was neutralized (using positive charges) consequently lowering the surface potential to ≈−9.4 V. The subsequent negative charge injection cycles significantly increased the surface potential value in the negative regime to ≈−119.9 V. Last, positive charges were injected, to raise the surface potential to a value of +68.7 V. These charge states arose from the presence of trapped, uncompensated charges on the surface, and could easily be manipulated, and monitored, as shown here. [ 28 ] The associated charge densities could be harnessed to make more efficient triboelectric nanogenerator devices with still higher voltage outputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[171] In addition, test conditions can affect the conversion of surface potential into charge density. [172,173] In the typical dual-channel KPFM measurement process, tap mode topography scanning can trigger contact electrification between the probe and the sample, causing significant errors in surface potential measurement. [172] Reasonable decoupling of contact electrification and surface potential measurement can be achieved by decreasing the free amplitude, increasing the set-point amplitude, and using a probe with a lower spring constant.…”
Section: Probe Microscopy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the charged area is similar to the thickness of insulators, or a surface has both positive and negative charge locally, a numerical simulation is required to determine Green's function of probes, insulators, and ground system to accurately quantify charge from surface potential. [ 53 ] The probes were worn down after multiple contacts (Figure S8 , Supporting Information) and were replaced with fresh ones regularly when the charging sign reversed. [ 54 ] After obtaining 8 × 8 µm 2 ‐sized KPFM images, surface potentials of the contact area were quantified by setting the surface potential of a non‐contact area as a baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%