2018
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying natural seasonal variation in mutation parameters with mutation accumulation lines

Abstract: Mutations create novel genetic variants, but their contribution to variation in fitness and other phenotypes may depend on environmental conditions. Furthermore, natural environments may be highly heterogeneous. We assessed phenotypes associated with survival and reproductive success in over 30,000 plants representing 100 mutation accumulation lines of Arabidopsis thaliana across four temporal environments at a single field site. In each of the four assays, environmental variance was substantially larger than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Why are we seeing a high proportion of positive-effect mutations? One possibility is that mutations that increase fitness are common in natural populations, and this is reflected in MA experiments (Shaw et al 2003;Rutter et al 2018). An alternative view is that deleterious mutations predominate in nature, principally because organisms are well adapted to the environments they typically…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why are we seeing a high proportion of positive-effect mutations? One possibility is that mutations that increase fitness are common in natural populations, and this is reflected in MA experiments (Shaw et al 2003;Rutter et al 2018). An alternative view is that deleterious mutations predominate in nature, principally because organisms are well adapted to the environments they typically…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, even a bivariate analysis (fruit number and inflorescence height; Figure c) reveals more lines that produce extreme phenotypes than either of the univariate analyses summarized in Figure (a,b). It is noteworthy that many of the T‐DNA mutant lines produce more fruits or larger inflorescences than Columbia, as seen in a previous phenotypic survey of these mutants (Rutter et al ., ), and is consistent with a relatively high frequency of mutant lines in A. thaliana with higher fitness than non‐mutant genotypes (Rutter et al ., , ). Figure (c) also suggests that with respect to fruit number and inflorescence size, morphospace is well explored by the phytometer lines included in each experimental replicate.…”
Section: Examples Of Findings From Unpakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the propagation of a set of MA lines through multiple generations, the genetic differences among the MA lines and between those lines and the founder reflect the input of mutation. Significant MA line effects for multiple traits, including performance and trait measures, were found under both field and greenhouse conditions (Rutter et al 2010; Roles et al 2016, Rutter et al 2018). Each of the MA lines in our experiment is fixed for an average of 20 different sequence level mutations, single nucleotide mutations (SNMs) and indels combined (Ossowski et al 2010, Rutter et al 2012, Weng et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used survival and seed set data of A. thaliana MA lines and the founder as assessed in field experiments in 2004 and 2005 from Rutter et al (2010, 2012 and 2018) planted in a randomized design (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation