2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05296-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying nitrate sources in a large reservoir for drinking water by using stable isotopes and a Bayesian isotope mixing model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous, geographically similar, measures of precipitation values, which are influenced by complex atmospheric processes including nitrate formation during thunderstorms and various photochemical reactions (Kendall, 1998;Xue et al, 2009), ranged from −4.7 to −2.1 and 36.6 to 44.9‰ for δ 15 N-NO 3 and δ 18 O-NO 3 , respectively, during the monsoon season of 2014 (Sanchez et al, 2017). These values are comparable to measured values in precipitation from other areas, where δ 15 N-NO 3 and δ 18 O-NO 3 values ranged from −15 to +15‰ (Kendall, 1998;Jin et al, 2019) and from +25 to +75‰ (Voerkelius and Schmidt, 1990;Durka et al, 1994;Kendall, 1998;Jin et al, 2019), respectively. Additionally, Kendall (1998) reported an average value for δ 18 O-NO 3 in precipitation of 43.6 ± 14.6‰ (n = 232).…”
Section: Solute Concentrations and Isotopic Analysissupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The previous, geographically similar, measures of precipitation values, which are influenced by complex atmospheric processes including nitrate formation during thunderstorms and various photochemical reactions (Kendall, 1998;Xue et al, 2009), ranged from −4.7 to −2.1 and 36.6 to 44.9‰ for δ 15 N-NO 3 and δ 18 O-NO 3 , respectively, during the monsoon season of 2014 (Sanchez et al, 2017). These values are comparable to measured values in precipitation from other areas, where δ 15 N-NO 3 and δ 18 O-NO 3 values ranged from −15 to +15‰ (Kendall, 1998;Jin et al, 2019) and from +25 to +75‰ (Voerkelius and Schmidt, 1990;Durka et al, 1994;Kendall, 1998;Jin et al, 2019), respectively. Additionally, Kendall (1998) reported an average value for δ 18 O-NO 3 in precipitation of 43.6 ± 14.6‰ (n = 232).…”
Section: Solute Concentrations and Isotopic Analysissupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of water (δD/δ 18 O-H 2 O) in precipitation and river water are widely used for hydrological tracing because they provide climatic and environmental information (Hu et al, 2019;Wallace et al, 2021;Wassenaar et al, 2011) (Jin et al, 2019;Hu et al 2020). Herein, a plot of the measured δD-H 2 O vs. δ 18 O-H 2 O for river water (n = 51) and LMWL was employed to assess water source dynamics in the Wen-Rui Tang River watershed.…”
Section: River Water Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncertainty is usually reported as a confidence interval of the contributing fractions. These models have already been adopted for defining water, dust, organic matter, or aerosol origins [8][9][10] and are also commonly used for the partitioning of nitrate sources in groundwaters [11][12][13] or surface waters [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nitrates may undergo intensive denitrification processes, which can significantly alter their final isotopic signatures [17][18][19]. Therefore, the application of a simple mixing model neglecting possible further isotopic fractionation of the final product may result in a bias in the model outputs [11,[13][14][15][16]20]. Some studies applying the nitrate mixing model manage to partially include denitrification fractionation in the model as a parameter added to the source isotopic signatures but without taking into account the fractionation progress [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation