Abstract. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) air pollution provides
valuable information for quantifying NOx (NOx = NO + NO2) emissions
and exposures. This study presents a comprehensive method to estimate
average tropospheric NO2 emission strengths derived from 4-year (May 2018–June 2022) TROPOspheric
Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) observations by combining a wind-assigned anomaly
approach and a machine learning (ML) method, the so-called gradient descent algorithm.
This combined approach is firstly applied to the Saudi Arabian capital city of
Riyadh, as a test site, and yields a total emission rate of 1.09×1026 molec. s−1. The ML-trained anomalies fit very well with the
wind-assigned anomalies, with an R2 value of 1.0 and a slope of 0.99.
Hotspots of NO2 emissions are apparent at several sites: over a
cement plant and power plants as well as over areas along highways.
Using the same approach, an emission rate of 1.99×1025 molec. s−1 is estimated in the Madrid metropolitan area, Spain. Both the
estimate and spatial pattern are comparable with the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) inventory. Weekly variations in NO2 emission are highly related to anthropogenic
activities, such as the transport sector. The NO2 emissions were
reduced by 16 % at weekends in Riyadh, and high reductions were found near
the city center and in areas along the highway. An average weekend
reduction estimate of 28 % was found in Madrid. The regions with dominant
sources are located in the east of Madrid, where residential areas and
the Madrid-Barajas airport are located. Additionally, due to the COVID-19 lockdowns, the NO2 emissions
decreased by 21 % in March–June 2020 in Riyadh compared with the same period in 2019. A much higher reduction
(62 %) is estimated for Madrid, where a very strict lockdown policy was
implemented. The high emission strengths during lockdown only persist in the
residential areas, and they cover smaller areas on weekdays compared with weekends.
The spatial patterns of NO2 emission strengths during lockdown are
similar to those observed at weekends in both cities. Although our analysis is
limited to two cities as test examples, the method has proven to provide
reliable and consistent results. It is expected to be suitable for other
trace gases and other target regions. However, it might become challenging
in some areas with complicated emission sources and topography, and specific
NO2 decay times in different regions and seasons should be taken into
account. These impacting factors should be considered in the future model to
further reduce the uncertainty budget.