2016
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying population declines based on presence‐only records for red‐list assessments

Abstract: Accurate trend estimates are necessary for understanding which species are declining and which are most in need of conservation action. Imperfect species detection may result in unreliable trend estimates because this may lead to the overestimation of declines. Because many management decisions are based on population trend estimates, such biases could have severe consequences for conservation policy. We used an occupancy-modeling framework to estimate detectability and calculate nationwide population trends f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern can be seen in our results on tree-frogs (H. arborea); this species is typically easily detectable from calls (Cruickshank et al, 2016;), yet our standard occupancy model (FNO model) produced detection estimates substantially lower than is typical for this species. However, the information used to estimate detection probabilities changes; now 6 surveys are used to calculate detection probability, and the estimated probability declines from 0.66 to 0.50 ( 3 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern can be seen in our results on tree-frogs (H. arborea); this species is typically easily detectable from calls (Cruickshank et al, 2016;), yet our standard occupancy model (FNO model) produced detection estimates substantially lower than is typical for this species. However, the information used to estimate detection probabilities changes; now 6 surveys are used to calculate detection probability, and the estimated probability declines from 0.66 to 0.50 ( 3 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The per-survey true detection probability p 11 was assigned a typical Uniform(0,1) prior, therefore this specification ensured that, on average p 11 > p 10 ( Figure S2). This prior choice for patch colonization and local extinction rates is based on the knowledge that patch persistence (the complement to local extinction) is greater than patch colonization rates for the species included in this study throughout Switzerland (Cruickshank, Ozgul, Zumbach, & Schmidt, 2016). This prior choice for patch colonization and local extinction rates is based on the knowledge that patch persistence (the complement to local extinction) is greater than patch colonization rates for the species included in this study throughout Switzerland (Cruickshank, Ozgul, Zumbach, & Schmidt, 2016).…”
Section: General Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species has suffered Bd -driven population declines and extirpations and is red-listed in some European countries 2729 . The tadpoles of this species overwinter so that in the summer there are often multiple cohorts of tadpoles present in the same pond.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 km2; van Strien et al 2013; or 100 km2; Kamp et al 2016) or selected habitat patches (Cruickshank et al 2016) and closure periods, often a breeding season of two months or more (Kendall et al 2013;van Strien et al 2013;Kamp et al 2016;Cruickshank et al 2016). In such an annual occupancy model occupancy is then defined as the proportion of occupied sites or grid squares at a landscape or regional scale during each season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%