2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying preparedness for emerging infectious diseases: A new methodology to assess health security at the subnational level in African countries

Abstract: Three outbreaks occurred in the last five years and it was observed that mortality was often confined to the initial half of the outbreak period and healthcare personnel were the major patients in the first half. Between 2009 and 2019, the monthly incidence ranged between 0 and 14.5 per 100,000 population. Univariate negative binomial regression analysis of the influenza incidence with the local weather parameters demonstrated that absolute humidity, relative humidity, insolation and rainfall were associated. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, there is evidence that country preparedness can vary substantially by pathogen, as well as subnationally—some countries and subregions have stronger capacity to detect, report, and respond to particular pathogens, perhaps based on patterns of prior exposure and capacity strengthening. 19 The EPI metric we use in this analysis does not capture these subnational and pathogen-specific dynamics; additional metric development could enable more fine-grained analyses of the relationship between preparedness, pathogen, political will, and reporting completeness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is evidence that country preparedness can vary substantially by pathogen, as well as subnationally—some countries and subregions have stronger capacity to detect, report, and respond to particular pathogens, perhaps based on patterns of prior exposure and capacity strengthening. 19 The EPI metric we use in this analysis does not capture these subnational and pathogen-specific dynamics; additional metric development could enable more fine-grained analyses of the relationship between preparedness, pathogen, political will, and reporting completeness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can include a detailed or targeted national level assessment, such as the WHO Joint External Evaluation (JEE), 45 Epidemic Preparedness Index, 46 Global Health Security Index, 47 or a more resource-intensive subnational level approach. 48 The preparedness assessment would serve as a baseline indicator of how ready a country (or subnational region) is to detect and respond to epidemic threats. Such measures typically take a systematic stock of health systems, personnel, supplies, and essential institutional capacities that are needed to support epidemic detection and response.…”
Section: Preparedness Assessment and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%