2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying prey availability using the foraging plasticity of a marine predator, the little penguin

Abstract: 1. Detecting changes in marine food webs is challenging, but top predators can provide information on lower trophic levels. However, many commonly measured predator responses can be decoupled from prey availability by plasticity in predator foraging effort. This can be overcome by directly measuring foraging effort and success and integrating these into a measure of foraging efficiency analogous to the catch per unit effort (CPUE) index employed by fisheries.2. We extended existing CPUE methods so that they wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This absence of knowledge hinders future analyses that would ideally aim to predict the availability of predominant prey as well as the costs of foraging, which are closely related to temperature and therefore vary with location. If such data were available, more refined 'feasting' hypotheses could be tested that incorporate environmental conditions and associated costs as well as latitude (Cavallo et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This absence of knowledge hinders future analyses that would ideally aim to predict the availability of predominant prey as well as the costs of foraging, which are closely related to temperature and therefore vary with location. If such data were available, more refined 'feasting' hypotheses could be tested that incorporate environmental conditions and associated costs as well as latitude (Cavallo et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet heterogeneity was expected to some degree among the seven locations, given the observed availability of different prey, both in composition and abundance, from the different seagrass systems. Indeed, such foraging plasticity in response to variation in prey availability has been observed in generalist predators (e.g., Cavallo et al 2020; Moorhouse-Gann et al 2020; Ng et al 2021). However, there was no apparent spatial structure in the stomach contents data such as a latitudinal trend, by distance, or between ecoregions (i.e., Northern Gulf of Mexico versus Floridian ecoregions; Spalding et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This may be due to the spatio-temporal constraints imposed on them during breeding. Outside the breeding season, little penguins have been recorded spending between 2 and 49 days at sea and foraging at maximum distances of 147 km from the colony [56]. In comparison, during early chick-rearing, foraging range and duration are highly restricted, with individuals typically alternating between guarding the chick in the nest and foraging each day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although little penguins are considered to be generalist foragers [56], it was predicted that individuals should still differentiate between high- and low-quality prey types in order to maintain the necessary time-energy balance. However, in the present study, patch numerical density was an important factor in predicting effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%