Quantifying rarity of intraspecific diversity at multiple spatial scales by combining fine-grain citizen-based data across national boundaries

Denoël, Mathieu; Schmidt, Benedikt R.; Fonters, Rémi; Hansbauer, Günter; Johanet, Aurélie; Kühnis, Jürgen; Poboljšaj, Katja; Schweiger, Silke; Sillero, Neftalí

doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109937

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conservation strategies should be directed toward maintaining the process of evolution, not just preserving its products we perceive as final, i.e., species ( 116 ). The best way to protect biodiversity would be to enforce a hierarchical (species > subspecies > populations) rather than a species-oriented binary (species ≠ non-species) system of conservation assessment, using recognized taxonomic categories rather than creating new terminologies.…”

Section: General Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species

Dufresnes,

Poyarkov,

Jablonski

2023

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delimiting and naming biodiversity is a vital step toward wildlife conservation and research. However, species delimitation must be consistent across biota so that the limited resources available for nature protection can be spent effectively and objectively. To date, newly discovered lineages typically are either left undescribed and thus remain unprotected or are being erroneously proposed as new species despite mixed evidence for completed speciation, in turn contributing to the emerging problem of taxonomic inflation. Inspired by recent conceptual and methodological progress, we propose a standardized workflow for species delimitation that combines phylogenetic and hybrid zone analyses of genomic datasets (“genomic taxonomy”), in which phylogeographic lineages that do not freely admix are ranked as species, while those that have remained fully genetically compatible are ranked as subspecies. In both cases, we encourage their formal taxonomic naming, diagnosis, and description to promote social awareness toward biodiversity. The use of loci throughout the genome overcomes the unreliability of widely used barcoding genes when phylogeographic patterns are complex, while the evaluation of divergence and reproductive isolation unifies the long-opposed concepts of lineage species and biological species. We suggest that a shift in conservation assessments from a single level (species) toward a two-level hierarchy (species and subspecies) will lead to a more balanced perception of biodiversity in which both intraspecific and interspecific diversity are valued and more adequately protected.

show abstract

Section: General Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%