2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the fact that a reduction of passengers contributes to large losses in public transport systems, some studies pointed out that extra measures to provide a high level of hygiene in vehicles generated additional costs ( Eisenmann et al, 2021 ). From sustainability and resilience points of view ( De Iuliis et al, 2021 ), a few studies that explored the effects of COVID-19 on mobility showed that multimodality in transport should be pursued, instead of focusing on a single transport mode ( Benita, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the fact that a reduction of passengers contributes to large losses in public transport systems, some studies pointed out that extra measures to provide a high level of hygiene in vehicles generated additional costs ( Eisenmann et al, 2021 ). From sustainability and resilience points of view ( De Iuliis et al, 2021 ), a few studies that explored the effects of COVID-19 on mobility showed that multimodality in transport should be pursued, instead of focusing on a single transport mode ( Benita, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cabinet Office, Government of Japan [6] released details of the 1995 Kobe (Japan) earthquake, which had a magnitude of 7.2 (on Richter scale) with 6437 fatalities and missing persons and seriously damaged major lifelines such as bridges, roads, and subways, Sichuan (China) earthquake in 2008 which had a magnitude of 7.9 (on Richter scale), claimed 80,000 lives and damage to infrastructures due to landslides and soil liquefaction [7], Ludian (China) in 2014 which had a 6.1-magnitude (on Richter scale) claimed 600 lives and damage to lifelines and property, Kathmandu (Nepal) in 2015 with 7.8-magnitude (on Richter scale) earthquake killed 9,000 people and severely damaging lifeline system [8] Chiapas (Mexico) 8.2-magnitude (on Richter scale) earthquake in 2017 with 61 persons killed and large scale destruction due to landslides [9]. Recently, many studies have been performed based on post earthquake scenario like performance assessment of Salyankot water supply project in nepal [10], risk-based assessment of infrastructure system [11,12], firefighting capacity evaluation of water distribution system [13], collective action in post-earthquake Nepal [14], estimation of restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines [15], assessment of functionality of buildings [16], restoration of water system using discrete-event simulation [17].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resilience of infrastructure systems and infrastructure interdependencies and the damage assessments are carried out with virtual city models for different seismic scenarios [23]. Some other frameworks have assessed the functionality of the critical infrastructure during and after disasters through performance-based design [24], a Bayesian network [25][26][27][28], fragility functions [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and restoration curves [29]. Furthermore, a qualitative assessment can be carried out to assess the functionality of the critical infrastructures [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%