2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying robustness in tall timber buildings: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the advances related to the structural robustness of timber high-rise buildings can also be highlighted, because of their capability to avoid disproportionate collapse after a catastrophic event. In this way, some key aspects for robust timber buildings can be emphasized: the design of joints and their performance against seismic loads; research based on numerical simulations with element removal scenarios, and the development of standards and construction codes [13,34,[284][285][286].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the advances related to the structural robustness of timber high-rise buildings can also be highlighted, because of their capability to avoid disproportionate collapse after a catastrophic event. In this way, some key aspects for robust timber buildings can be emphasized: the design of joints and their performance against seismic loads; research based on numerical simulations with element removal scenarios, and the development of standards and construction codes [13,34,[284][285][286].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main drawbacks of previous models was the lack of an incremental damping formulation [31], which is also a general weakness for the most common damping implementations [32]. During a collapse, the connections and members may enter the nonlinear range and parts of the building may detach from the surviving structure.…”
Section: Incremental Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting for inelastic behaviour in the model would have increased the rotational capacity y and may increase the deformations of the members before failure. However, including ductility in the inelastic behaviour of the connections may not increase the robustness of the structure [31]. For edge or internal column damagescenarios, ductility in the connections could be beneficial.…”
Section: Connection Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, tall timber buildings (TBs) have become viable and effective solution to meet sustainability objectives 1,3 . With the demand for innovation and resiliency, the research is now oriented towards the study of tall TBs in order to provide new proposal and solutions for their design and execution 4–6 . International codes are supporting this development, such as the Canadian National Building Code (NBC) 7 and 2021 International Building Code (IBC) 8 which now allow TBs up to 12 and 18 stories, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 With the demand for innovation and resiliency, the research is now oriented towards the study of tall TBs in order to provide new proposal and solutions for their design and execution. [4][5][6] International codes are supporting this development, such as the Canadian National Building Code (NBC) 7 and 2021 International Building Code (IBC) 8 which now allow TBs up to 12 and 18 stories, respectively. One of the most challenging topics on tall TBs is their performance under strong wind and earthquake loads 6,9 and thus the development of new protection techniques and performance-based design methodologies suitable for the case of tall TBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%