2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying seismic vulnerability, dynamical shear strain and liquefaction of the Quaternary deposits in the Doon valley near the Main Boundary Thrust in the Northwest Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The sampling location has a vast variation in its lithology due to deposistion minerals and ores [24][25][26][27][28]. as it falls over and near the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) region.…”
Section: Geology Of the Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The sampling location has a vast variation in its lithology due to deposistion minerals and ores [24][25][26][27][28]. as it falls over and near the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) region.…”
Section: Geology Of the Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated recurrence interval of such a Mw 7.0 event in the Himalayan region is about 100 years 4 . Thus when the region exceeds its elastic limit then a large earthquake can produce a large rupture extending towards the HFT and the Gangetic plain, where secondary seismic effects like liquefaction 10 or cavity formation can cause great havoc in the densely populated foothills. Thus the regions marked as interseismic low strain rate corridors in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continued northward movement of the Indian plate against Eurasia resulted substantial stress accumulation across the Himalayan collisional belt which eventually released as small to large earthquakes 4 – 6 . The great Himalayan arc witnessed many devastating earthquakes in the past like the 1905 Kangra, 1934 Bihar–Nepal, 1950 Assam, 2005 Kashmir, 2015 Nepal and many more indicate that the region is seismically vulnerable 7 – 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%