2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3007709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview

Abstract: Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four branches are separated at the end of the path, which means that these four paths have the same SPC value. Bai et al [45] build an institution citation network and a heterogeneous network composed of institutions and papers nodes. Then, a PR-based model, IPRank, was proposed to quantify the impact of institutions and papers simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four branches are separated at the end of the path, which means that these four paths have the same SPC value. Bai et al [45] build an institution citation network and a heterogeneous network composed of institutions and papers nodes. Then, a PR-based model, IPRank, was proposed to quantify the impact of institutions and papers simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In this paper, we regard the abovementioned citations as anomalous citations. Anomalous citations are academic misconducts that are currently highly concerned by the academic community (Franck 1999;Bai et al 2016;Chorus and Waltman 2016;Mimouni et al 2016;Bai et al 2017Bai et al , 2020Liu et al 2022). It is essential to detect anomalous citations because they will bring a lot of negative effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the quantity of citations is one measure of the quality of a paper, or the impact of academic entities [4]. For example, existing bibliometric indicators such as h-index, gindex, and Journal Impact Factor (JIF) all focus on quantitative evaluation aspect while ignoring qualitative aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%