2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying surface fuels for fire modelling in temperate forests using airborne lidar and Sentinel-2: potential and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study align harmoniously with the investigations conducted by Labenski [37]. In their work, they embarked on modeling and mapping surface fuels in mixed forests, employing the amalgamation of airborne LiDAR and Sentinel-2 data.…”
Section: Estimation Accuracy Of Machine Learning Model Based On Rando...supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings of this study align harmoniously with the investigations conducted by Labenski [37]. In their work, they embarked on modeling and mapping surface fuels in mixed forests, employing the amalgamation of airborne LiDAR and Sentinel-2 data.…”
Section: Estimation Accuracy Of Machine Learning Model Based On Rando...supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Future works could refine the mapping of vegetation types and the related fuel models using spatially explicit local information and more accurate datasets. For instance, LiDAR-derived data and metrics could be used to improve the assessment and mapping of canopy fuels, which are Salis et al 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1241378 Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 16 frontiersin.org crucial for assessing the occurrence of crown fires, as well as for estimating canopy understory (Gonzalez-Ferreiro et al, 2017;Mauro et al, 2021;Marino et al, 2022;Labenski et al, 2023). Likewise, more accurate mapping of herbaceous fuels (i.e., considering their level of agricultural management or grazing regimes) and shrublands (i.e., determining height, density, canopy cover) would improve the assignment of specific fuel models, with relevant effects in the fuel map quality and reliability for several fire-prone contexts (García et al, 2011;Marino et al, 2016;Huesca et al, 2019;Bright et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of forest fuel mapping and the estimation of biomass, several RaDaR detection systems such as Airborne SAR (AIRSAR), GeoSAR, and Intermap Technology Corporation are available for spatial monitoring [33,34]. A recent study has shown that combining both passive and active sensors improves the results of fuel mapping in contrast to using only a single data source [35]. While multispectral passive sensors can be used to estimate species composition based on spectral response, LiDAR active sensors can extract the vertical forest structure, and therefore, the combined use of both types of sensors provides a novel and unique approach to mapping fuel types [7,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%