2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Surface Melt and Liquid Water on the Greenland Ice Sheet using L-band Radiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface melting is extensive on the GrIS, and spatial variation in the effects of this melting [3] enabled us to divide the snow pack of the GrIS into distinct diagenetic facies, or zones [4], such as dry-snow facies, percolation facies, wet-snow facies (WSF), and ice facies, etc. Wet snow is an import indicator of snow melting in an area [5], accurate acquisition of time-series of WSF information is crucial in investigating the uncertainty of GrIS mass balance and assessing global sea level change [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface melting is extensive on the GrIS, and spatial variation in the effects of this melting [3] enabled us to divide the snow pack of the GrIS into distinct diagenetic facies, or zones [4], such as dry-snow facies, percolation facies, wet-snow facies (WSF), and ice facies, etc. Wet snow is an import indicator of snow melting in an area [5], accurate acquisition of time-series of WSF information is crucial in investigating the uncertainty of GrIS mass balance and assessing global sea level change [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using variations in C-band SAR image intensity to map zones of dry snow, percolation, wet snow, and bare ice [4], extending the early facies work of Benson [3] into the satellite era [8]. A large number of GrIS surface melting monitoring methods were developed by using active microwaves data [9]- [11], passive microwave data [7], [12], [13] and scatterometer data [10], [14], [15] in subsequent studies. However, these methods are difficult to satisfy the requirements of large scale, high spatial resolution and time series at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing observations from polar orbiting satellites have global coverage and frequent sampling over the boreal Arctic and provide an opportunity to observe snow processes at moderate resolution. Passive microwave observations, in particular, are useful because brightness temperature measurements from both lower frequency (1-2 GHz) and higher frequency (18-37 GHz) radiometers are highly sensitive to liquid water content (LWC) changes within the snowpack [16][17][18]. Further, clouds and polar darkness have little influence over the passive microwave (PMW) retrievals due to the high atmospheric transparency to land surface microwave emissions at these frequencies, which do not rely on incoming solar energy [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods cannot quantify daily melt flux, mainly because (a) the lack of accurate in-situ daily melt flux measurement in the regression model, and (b) the response of microwave measurements to meltwater is nonlinear and varies spatially and temporally due to the changes in snow properties Zheng et al, 2018). Recently, Houtz et al (2019Houtz et al ( , 2021 have developed an algorithm that can estimate GrIS liquid water content from L-band satellite radiometer observations using a physically deterministic emission model. However, liquid water content does not represent melt flux because of the refereeing, migration and retention of meltwater which is widely observed over the GrIS (Miller et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%