2023
DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the benefit of nonselective beta-blockers in the prevention of hepatic decompensation: A Bayesian reanalysis of the PREDESCI trial

Abstract: Background and Aims: Beta-blockers have been studied for the prevention of variceal bleeding and, more recently, for the prevention of all-cause decompensation. Some uncertainties regarding the benefit of beta-blockers for the prevention of decompensation remain. Bayesian analyses enhance the interpretation of trials. The purpose of this study was to provide clinically meaningful estimates of both the probability and magnitude of the benefit of beta-blocker treatment across a range of patient types.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mean dosages of propranolol and carvedilol actually achieved post-titration were 95 mg/day and 19 mg/day, respectively. After 2 years of clinical follow-up, patients treated with NSBB manifested significantly lower risk of decompensation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26–0.97), predominantly a lower risk of developing ascites, recently confirmed in a Bayesian reanalysis 110 . Some caution should be made with applying these findings to all patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH because of the unique selection criteria of patients for this study; all patients had confirmed CSPH by HVPG and were not selected for inclusion by NILDA.…”
Section: Stage-specific Management Of Phmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the mean dosages of propranolol and carvedilol actually achieved post-titration were 95 mg/day and 19 mg/day, respectively. After 2 years of clinical follow-up, patients treated with NSBB manifested significantly lower risk of decompensation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26–0.97), predominantly a lower risk of developing ascites, recently confirmed in a Bayesian reanalysis 110 . Some caution should be made with applying these findings to all patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH because of the unique selection criteria of patients for this study; all patients had confirmed CSPH by HVPG and were not selected for inclusion by NILDA.…”
Section: Stage-specific Management Of Phmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…After 2 years of clinical follow-up, patients treated with NSBB manifested significantly lower risk of decompensation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26-0.97), predominantly a lower risk of developing ascites, recently confirmed in a Bayesian reanalysis. [110] Some caution should be made with applying these findings to all patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH because of the unique selection criteria of patients for this study; all patients had confirmed CSPH by HVPG and were not selected for inclusion by NILDA. Additionally, the majority of patients had untreated hepatitis C prior to availability of all-oral direct antiviral therapy, and the effect of ongoing alcohol use was not assessed.…”
Section: Stage-specific Management Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Subsequent studies reinforce the value of NSBBs to prevent decompensation. 20,21 At present, CSPH can be confirmed non-invasively, mainly relying on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography. 18,22 LSM ≤15 KPa plus platelets ≥150x10 9 /L rule-out CSPH, and LSM of ≥25 KPa rule it in quite accurately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%