2016
DOI: 10.4018/ijswis.2016070102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Connectivity of a Semantic Warehouse and Understanding its Evolution over Time

Abstract: In many applications one has to fetch and assemble pieces of information coming from more than one source for building a semantic warehouse offering more advanced query capabilities. In this paper the authors describe the corresponding requirements and challenges, and they focus on the aspects of quality and value of the warehouse. For this reason they introduce various metrics (or measures) for quantifying its connectivity, and consequently its ability to answer complex queries. The authors demonstrate the be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the increase in distance leads bidders to lower the psychological price of the art; thus, distance diffusion causes bidders to lower the valuation of artwork. As funding is a dynamic process, the time factor would also impact the pledge [39].…”
Section: Distance Diffusion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the increase in distance leads bidders to lower the psychological price of the art; thus, distance diffusion causes bidders to lower the valuation of artwork. As funding is a dynamic process, the time factor would also impact the pledge [39].…”
Section: Distance Diffusion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are various methods that focus on monitoring the “health” of various RDF-based systems, e.g. [ 11 ] focuses on the connectivity monitoring in the context of a semantic warehouse over time, [ 7 ] focuses on monitoring Linked Data over a specific period of time, [ 2 ] focuses on measuring the dynamics of a specific RDF dataset, and [ 15 ] proposes a framework that identifies, analyses and understands such dynamics. SPARQLES [ 20 ] and SpEnD [ 22 ] focus on the monitoring of public SPARQL endpoints, DyKOSMap framework [ 3 ] adapts the mappings of Knowledge Organization Systems, as the data are modified over time.…”
Section: Related Work and Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most connected triad of datasets, concerning classes, contains the following set of datasets (DBpedia, Opencyc [51], ImageSnippets [52]) with 188 common classes, while for the properties, the most connected triad includes (VIVO Wustl [53], FAO [54], VIVO scripps [55]) with 68 common properties. All the measurements for pairs, triads, and quads of subsets of datasets (in total 11,689,103 million subsets) for each different measurement type are accessible through LODsyndesis and datahub.io (http://datahub.io/dataset/connectivity-oflod-datasets), in CSV and RDF format, by using VoID-WH ontology [56], which is an extension of VoID ontology [57] (in total we have created 99,221,766 million triples). The most popular datasets.…”
Section: Connectivity Measurements For Lod Cloud Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%