2019
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Effect of Black Hole Feedback from the Central Galaxy on the Satellite Populations of Groups and Clusters

Abstract: Super-massive black holes are fundamental ingredients in our theoretical understanding of galaxy formation. They are likely the only sources energetic enough to regulate star formation within massive dark matter halos, but observational evidence of this process remains elusive. The effect of black hole feedback is expected to be a strong function of halo mass, and galaxy groups and clusters are among the most massive structures in the Universe. At fixed halo mass, we find an enhanced fraction of quiescent sate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation between star-forming and quiescent satellites is based on their location with respect to the star formation main sequence (SFMS). In particular, we find that the SFMS in our sample of satellites is well-fitted 31 by log SFR = 0.75 log M − 7.5. As described in the main text, given this definition of the SFMS and having stellar masses and SFR measurements for each satellite, we label as star-forming any satellite departing less than 1 dex from the SFMS.…”
Section: Methods 1 Sample Properties 11 Sloan Digital Sky Server Datasupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation between star-forming and quiescent satellites is based on their location with respect to the star formation main sequence (SFMS). In particular, we find that the SFMS in our sample of satellites is well-fitted 31 by log SFR = 0.75 log M − 7.5. As described in the main text, given this definition of the SFMS and having stellar masses and SFR measurements for each satellite, we label as star-forming any satellite departing less than 1 dex from the SFMS.…”
Section: Methods 1 Sample Properties 11 Sloan Digital Sky Server Datasupporting
confidence: 51%
“…For halos hosting under-massive black holes, the observed amplitude in the signal is 0.016 ±0.002. The expected uncertainty in these black hole mass estimates is of ∼ 0.3 dex due the intrinsic scatter in the M • -σ relation 31 . In individual galaxies, this over-massive vs under-massive black hole metric has been now widely used to probe the interplay between black hole activity and star formation 11,41,[43][44][45][46][47][48] , further supporting a black hole-related origin for the observed signal.…”
Section: Dependence On Galaxy Properties In Sdss Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finally, some studies mention the possible role of AGN feedback from the central galaxy in quenching its satellites (e.g., Dashyan et al 2019;Martín-Navarro et al 2019): the lack of quenching in high-redshift satellites could therefore also be the consequence of an imperfect AGN feedback implementation at high redshift, although hydrodynamical simulations show that the activity of SNe in low mass galaxies quench the growth of black holes and their associated AGN feedback (e.g., Dubois et al 2015;Habouzit et al 2017;Anglés-Alcázar et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conflicting observational results could be explained by the difficulty in detecting the satellites in the neighborhood of a luminous quasar, where the strong AGN feedback can play a fundamental role in shaping their baryonic component. AGN feedback could affect the MBH environment well beyond the host galaxy scale radius and significantly modify the star formation (SF) activity of the orbiting companions (see Martín-Navarro et al 2019, 2021. Dashyan et al (2019) explicitly investigated, in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, the AGN-driven quenching effect within galactic satellites at low redshift (z < 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%