2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00626-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the effects of forestry practices on the recovery of upland streams and lochs from acidification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 10 years earlier, sulphate suppression of DOC export may have been more eVective, as relatively lower DOC concentration increases and no signiWcant change in amplitude range were observed in the early part of the time series during the 1988-1990 felling years at Burn 10. Harriman et al (2003) found that DOC trends in surface waters draining forests and moorlands were similar, and concluded that forest impacts on DOC export were relatively minor, as at Loch Ard between Burn 2 (moorland) and Burn 10 (forested). This might be the case except during certain periods when soil physicochemical conditions are appropriate to accentuate disturbance of soil processes such as occurred at the Burn 11 catchment.…”
Section: Long-term Trends In Doc Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, 10 years earlier, sulphate suppression of DOC export may have been more eVective, as relatively lower DOC concentration increases and no signiWcant change in amplitude range were observed in the early part of the time series during the 1988-1990 felling years at Burn 10. Harriman et al (2003) found that DOC trends in surface waters draining forests and moorlands were similar, and concluded that forest impacts on DOC export were relatively minor, as at Loch Ard between Burn 2 (moorland) and Burn 10 (forested). This might be the case except during certain periods when soil physicochemical conditions are appropriate to accentuate disturbance of soil processes such as occurred at the Burn 11 catchment.…”
Section: Long-term Trends In Doc Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, tall forest canopies have been shown to increase loadings of atmospherically-derived acidic oxide pollutants by dry and occult deposition and thus, play a role in soil and surface water acidification (Hornung et al, 1986;Soulsby and Reynolds, 1992;Neal et al, 1997). More recently, as many of these new forests are harvested at the end of 40-50 year rotations, clear-felling operations have been shown to have a range of impacts including increased runoff (Roberts and Crane, 1997), fine sediment mobilization (Johnson and Whitehead, 1993) and increased nutrient leaching, particularly of nitrate, and concomitant acidification (Neal et al, 1992;Harriman et al, 2003). However, the exact nature of impacts vary massively, depending upon catchment characteristics; the precise nature and timing of the forest management operations; their location within a catchment, the proportion of the catchment affected and prevailing climatic conditions (Neal et al, 2004a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Evans and Monteith (2001) note that with only a small number of forest sites in the UK AWMN and considerable inter-site heterogeneity, it is difficult to generalise the effects of forestry on recovery from acidification. In a study of Scottish forest catchments, felling appeared to accelerate recovery trends with respect to acidifying components although forest streams were still more acid and contained higher concentrations of labile aluminium compared to moorland catchments (Harriman et al, 2003). At Beddgelert, the clear geochemical differences between D6 and the forest streams and the effects of clear felling are confounding factors in a forest-moorland comparison of acidity trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%