2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2016.7590770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the human-robot interaction forces between a lower limb exoskeleton and healthy users

Abstract: To counter the many disadvantages of prolonged wheelchair use, patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are beginning to turn towards robotic exoskeletons. However, we are currently unaware of the magnitude and distribution of forces acting between the user and the exoskeleton. This is a critical issue, as SCI patients have an increased susceptibility to skin lesions and pressure ulcer development. Therefore, we developed a real-time force measuring apparatus, which was placed at the physical human-robot inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is important not only to develop safety measures, but also to verify safety of the device after the intervention experiment. In studies that developed a wearable physical assistive robot, skin injury resulting from excessive rubbing between the cuff of the robot and the surface of the skin was con rmed in intervention experiments [13,14]. In the present study, we con rmed that no skin injury occurred between the seat and buttocks, and that the users did not experience any pain while using the system [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, it is important not only to develop safety measures, but also to verify safety of the device after the intervention experiment. In studies that developed a wearable physical assistive robot, skin injury resulting from excessive rubbing between the cuff of the robot and the surface of the skin was con rmed in intervention experiments [13,14]. In the present study, we con rmed that no skin injury occurred between the seat and buttocks, and that the users did not experience any pain while using the system [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The asterisks represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.005). Adapted from [10] correlation, one can postulate that the interaction forces can be attributed to the muscular activity of the participant. On the other hand, muscle/force pairs that have little correlation one can perhaps attribute the interaction forces at such positions to the movement of the exoskeleton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies have investigated EMG activity with the view of developing a user intention based algorithm for the control of the exoskeleton [11,12]. However, this knowledge has been largely developed away from the complex physical human-robot interactions that have been highlighted in a number of studies [9,10]. Hence, this study presents suitable experimental protocols and data to extend the findings of [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding how a person physically interacts with rigid linkages becomes important especially for exoskeleton devices controlled by interaction forces only. Lower limb exoskeletons are usually developed for assisting standing and for walking, which is cyclic movement constrained by the ground and repetitive, rather stereotyped stance and swing phases of gait [9]. In contrast, arm rehabilitation training by upper limb exoskeletons must have more flexibility in protocol design to achieve reaching and grasping at a variety of locations in peripersonal space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%