2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the impact of forest management on the carbon balance of the forest-wood product chain: A case study applied to even-aged oak stands in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Man et al (2013) also reported that reduced harvest levels stored significantly more carbon over the 100-year planning horizon as compared to strategies that focused on tree growth rates (Johnson et al 2009). Similar conclusions have also been drawn from boreal forests (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Man et al 2013, Europe (Fortin et al 2012), and Chile (Swanson 2009), Australia (Ranatunga et al 2008), and other regions.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Agb Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Man et al (2013) also reported that reduced harvest levels stored significantly more carbon over the 100-year planning horizon as compared to strategies that focused on tree growth rates (Johnson et al 2009). Similar conclusions have also been drawn from boreal forests (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Man et al 2013, Europe (Fortin et al 2012), and Chile (Swanson 2009), Australia (Ranatunga et al 2008), and other regions.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Agb Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A particular challenge, in this regard, is to seek site-specific management options because of the variations among ecosystem types and between the regions and their importance at different temporal scales (e.g., short-term vs. longterm values - Lafortezza et al 2008). Stimulated by these needs, numerous large-scale experiments in the United States (Chen et al 2014) and elsewhere (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Ranatunga et al 2008, Fortin et al 2012, Man et al 2013) were initiated to manipulate ecosystem structures and compositions. These experiments, unlike conventional approaches in forestry and ecology (Sheriff & He 1997), were designed to mimic natural and human disturbances at large spatial scales and to quantify the ecological responses with sound controls of the manipulations and statistical confidence (i.e., random block design with at least three replications).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinning is decided on the basis of the deviation between the actual and potential stand density for any given diameter. This approach relates to the so-called relative density index (Fortin et al, 2012), the land use disturbance index or hemeroby and naturalness approaches (Schall and Ammer, 2013). Exceeding a threshold diameter results in a clear cut and the stand is replanted in the next year.…”
Section: Forest Management and Natural Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturalness indices making use of only diameter and stand density or the so-called relative density index (RDI) have been previously implemented at the stand level (Fortin et al, 2012) as well as in large-scale models (Bellassen et al, 2010). This approach was shown to successfully reproduce the biomass changes during the life cycle of a forest Fortin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Forest Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both strategies can lead to contradictory guidelines, integrated approaches must be developed to find the optimal way of managing forest carbon (McKechnie et al 2010). Such approaches require accurate estimates of carbon fluxes into and out of the forest as well as of carbon stocks within the forest and in wood products (Vanclay and Skovsgaard 1997;Ketterings et al 2001;Fortin et al 2012). These forest carbon estimates are also crucial for carbon credit trading and national reporting of greenhouse gas inventories to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%