2023
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the impact of individual and collective compliance with infection control measures for ethical public health policy

Abstract: Infectious disease control measures often require collective compliance of large numbers of individuals to benefit public health. This raises ethical questions regarding the value of the public health benefit created by individual and collective compliance. Answering these requires estimating the extent to which individual actions prevent infection of others. We develop mathematical techniques enabling quantification of the impacts of individuals or groups complying with three public health measures: border qu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…not absent) at high levels of herd immunity where the risk is small -although this arguably ignores overdetermination. 20 More broadly, this view will partly turn on empirical estimates of risk to others, which might not track herd immunity in a purely linear manner, [20][21][22] and these empirical aspects of the problem arguably warrant further investigation. In any case, the scalar view significantly deflates any special moral claim attributed to the HIT or elimination, even for diseases that are, in principle, amenable to elimination via herd immunity.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…not absent) at high levels of herd immunity where the risk is small -although this arguably ignores overdetermination. 20 More broadly, this view will partly turn on empirical estimates of risk to others, which might not track herd immunity in a purely linear manner, [20][21][22] and these empirical aspects of the problem arguably warrant further investigation. In any case, the scalar view significantly deflates any special moral claim attributed to the HIT or elimination, even for diseases that are, in principle, amenable to elimination via herd immunity.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where herd immunity refers to the indirect protection of vulnerable individuals by people with immunity, this entails a moral obligation to contribute to the reduction of risk for this group, although on the scalar view one might think that this obligation becomes weaker (though not absent) at high levels of herd immunity where the risk is small - although this arguably ignores overdetermination. 20 More broadly, this view will partly turn on empirical estimates of risk to others, which might not track herd immunity in a purely linear manner, 20–22 and these empirical aspects of the problem arguably warrant further investigation. In any case, the scalar view significantly deflates any special moral claim attributed to the HIT or elimination, even for diseases that are, in principle, amenable to elimination via herd immunity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%