2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Negative Impact of Interactions Between Users of Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Use Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to follow a quantitative research set up with an online experiment accompanied by a user questionnaire. Recent studies have shown a valuable contribution of questionnaires, including the area of public opinion on mobility usage [59], the case of mobility-impaired individuals [60], or potential conflicts in shared spaces among different mobility means [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to follow a quantitative research set up with an online experiment accompanied by a user questionnaire. Recent studies have shown a valuable contribution of questionnaires, including the area of public opinion on mobility usage [59], the case of mobility-impaired individuals [60], or potential conflicts in shared spaces among different mobility means [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strauss et al [ 9 ] proposed a methodology to estimate bicycle volumes and cyclist injury risk throughout the entire network of road segments and intersections, justifying the benefits of cycle tracks. Nikiforiadis et al [ 22 , 23 ] explored the pedestrians–cyclists shared use space and quantified the impact of interactions; moreover, the authors highlighted concerns regarding conflicts and delayed passing in access. Kaplan et al [ 10 ] proposed the joint model of frequency and severity of cyclist–motorist collisions, and emphasized the focus on bicycle paths to improve road design and traffic management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these positive remarks, the design elements of roundabouts are not uniformly fixed on a worldwide scale because of the variety in the traffic volumes on the axes/legs of a roundabout, the available space at the area of a roundabout that could affect the number of the selected lanes, and the local traffic regulations or policies [5,9,10]. Most importantly, the trade-off of fulfilling safety and capacity criteria controls the design type and the efficiency of a roundabout [9]. The general rule is that the higher the number of lanes enabling parallel vehicle movement, the less safety levels of roundabouts because of the high-speed values that can be achieved [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research's flowchart is given in Figure 2. Despite these positive remarks, the design elements of roundabouts are not uniformly fixed on a worldwide scale because of the variety in the traffic volumes on the axes/legs of a roundabout, the available space at the area of a roundabout that could affect the number of the selected lanes, and the local traffic regulations or policies [5,9,10]. Most importantly, the trade-off of fulfilling safety and capacity criteria controls the design type and the efficiency of a roundabout [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%