2023
DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00575-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the optimal time gap between consecutive events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zero-length element and mass-proportional Raleigh damping were adopted for SDOF modeling of massspring and damping, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the uniaxial Material ElasticPP and Steel01 from the OpenSEES library was assigned to zero-length element to model the hysteresis behavior of the steel structures as an accepted method by many researchers and specifications [17,34,36,38,41]. Additionally, 30 periods of vibration from 0.1 s to 3 s with 0.1 s time intervals were considered for dynamic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zero-length element and mass-proportional Raleigh damping were adopted for SDOF modeling of massspring and damping, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the uniaxial Material ElasticPP and Steel01 from the OpenSEES library was assigned to zero-length element to model the hysteresis behavior of the steel structures as an accepted method by many researchers and specifications [17,34,36,38,41]. Additionally, 30 periods of vibration from 0.1 s to 3 s with 0.1 s time intervals were considered for dynamic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, stiffness deterioration and strength degradation in structural systems are effective on displacement demand of the system under probable future events. The different stiffness deterioration and strength degradation protocols have not been considered before on Gamma factor (γ), where many researchers have confirmed its significant effect on seismic responses, such as Amirchoupani et al [34,35], Abdollahzadeh et al [36], ASCE/SEI 41-17 [1], and FEMA series [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the required time gap primarily depends on damping ratio, ductility capacity, fundamental period of vibration, lateral yield strength of the building, and hysteric modeling parameters of materials. 79,80 Different values of time gap considered by researchers in the past are mentioned in Table 5. Recently, Pirooz et al 79 carried out a detailed investigation to estimate the required time gap to ensure the at-rest condition of the structure after mainshock.…”
Section: Time Gap Between Mainshock and Aftershock Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, an adequate time gap is considered so that free vibrations of the structure cease after the occurrence of the mainshock. The value of the required time gap primarily depends on damping ratio, ductility capacity, fundamental period of vibration, lateral yield strength of the building, and hysteric modeling parameters of materials 79,80 …”
Section: Selection and Scaling Of Ground Motion Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%