2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the rate of Fe2+-catalyzed recrystallization based on a unifying model framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These inconsistencies suggest that variations in surface area loadings calculated from BET measurements alone cannot fully explain the differences in reaction rates and extents observed for goethite. ,, This may be due in part to BET specific surface area values misrepresenting the true reactive surface area of particles in water due to aggregation. Additionally, smaller particles are also known to have larger hydrated surface energies, which can increase their solubility, alter their phase stability, and raise the standard reduction potential ( E H 0 ) value for the α-FeOOH/Fe 2+ redox couple. , However, quantifying these trends is complicated by the fact that hydrated surface energies depend on particle aggregation states and the solution pH and chemistry, including the concentrations and types of ions present. , These trends could be further complicated by evidence that goethite may undergo substantial recrystallization in the presence of aqueous Fe 2+ at circumneutral pH values. , Currently, there are insufficient data in the literature to quantify how goethite surface energies vary as a function of particle size, aggregation state, and pH, but the limited available data indicates that pH plays a significant role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inconsistencies suggest that variations in surface area loadings calculated from BET measurements alone cannot fully explain the differences in reaction rates and extents observed for goethite. ,, This may be due in part to BET specific surface area values misrepresenting the true reactive surface area of particles in water due to aggregation. Additionally, smaller particles are also known to have larger hydrated surface energies, which can increase their solubility, alter their phase stability, and raise the standard reduction potential ( E H 0 ) value for the α-FeOOH/Fe 2+ redox couple. , However, quantifying these trends is complicated by the fact that hydrated surface energies depend on particle aggregation states and the solution pH and chemistry, including the concentrations and types of ions present. , These trends could be further complicated by evidence that goethite may undergo substantial recrystallization in the presence of aqueous Fe 2+ at circumneutral pH values. , Currently, there are insufficient data in the literature to quantify how goethite surface energies vary as a function of particle size, aggregation state, and pH, but the limited available data indicates that pH plays a significant role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%