2019
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1577432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity of points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can be divided into four steps, as shown in Figure 2. First, we determine whether the flow set is homogeneous by using several quantitative indices proposed in our previous work (such as NLH * , A-w) [47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This method can be divided into four steps, as shown in Figure 2. First, we determine whether the flow set is homogeneous by using several quantitative indices proposed in our previous work (such as NLH * , A-w) [47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sparse flow is seen as noise, while each dense flow can be generated into flow clusters based on the density-connected clustering concept [36] in the final step. Since our previous work [47] provides the details of the first step, we introduce only the remaining three steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a local repulsive cluster is present in a complex heterogeneous point process (with multiple heterogeneous components), the commonly used statistical measurements for quantifying heterogeneity may be invalid in some situations. For example, as seen in Figure 2, although the statistical measurement A [33][34] effectively quantifies the heterogeneity of two point processes, as seen in Figure 2a,b, that contain homogeneous components, it cannot effectively quantify the heterogeneity of a complex point process with heterogeneous components, as seen in Figure 2c with one repulsive cluster and one aggregative cluster; In this case, an incorrect CSR (complete spatial randomness) distribution judgment may be made. Specifically, a repulsive pattern is not subject to the same specific probability distribution function as homogeneous components in a point process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%