Proceedings of the Joint COST TU1402 - COST TU1406 - IABSE WC1 Workshop: The Value of Structural Health Monitoring for the Reli 2017
DOI: 10.5592/co/bshm2017.4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the value of SHM for emergency management of bridges at-risk from seismic damage based on their performance indicators

Abstract: Abstract. This paper proposes a framework for quantifying the value of information that can be derived from a structural health monitoring (SHM) system installed on a bridge which may sustain damage in the mainshock of an earthquake and further damage in an aftershock. The pre-posterior Bayesian analysis and the decision tree are the two main tools employed. The evolution of the damage state of the bridge with an SHM system is cast as a time-dependent, stochastic, discrete-state, observable dynamical system. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Vardanega et al [72] presented an SHM value assessment methodology that discusses the roles of different stakeholders in delivering value, and the proposed value assessment matrix facilitates efficient and effective communication among stakeholders. Omenzetter et al [73] proposed a framework for quantifying the value of the information generated by an SHM system, including decision trees and risk models, which promote the valuation of the soft benefits of SHM systems and the accuracy and objectivity of the assessment. Nepomuceno et al [74] introduced a methodology for assessing the value of an SHM system prior to its deployment.…”
Section: Pre-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vardanega et al [72] presented an SHM value assessment methodology that discusses the roles of different stakeholders in delivering value, and the proposed value assessment matrix facilitates efficient and effective communication among stakeholders. Omenzetter et al [73] proposed a framework for quantifying the value of the information generated by an SHM system, including decision trees and risk models, which promote the valuation of the soft benefits of SHM systems and the accuracy and objectivity of the assessment. Nepomuceno et al [74] introduced a methodology for assessing the value of an SHM system prior to its deployment.…”
Section: Pre-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the consideration of the natural deterioration of the structure due to corrosion, fatigue, scour, et cetera, it may also be relevant to consider the seismic risk. According to Omenzetter et al, after the occurrence of a mainshock earthquake, the affected area is normally exposed to a number of aftershocks during the following period, which can last for months. A structure that has been weakened and damaged as a result of a powerful mainshock is then more vulnerable to the following increased level of seismic activity and even to the normal operating conditions of the bridge (e.g., traffic).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Aside from public safety, researchers have demonstrated that SHM of civil structures has the potential to increase the life span of structures, lowers construction costs, enables early detection of risk, and improves the overall performance of the structure. 8,9 Previous research efforts have investigated soft elastomeric capacitors for fatigue crack monitoring of steel. Soft elastomeric capacitors (SEC) have been used to monitor loads and fatigue cracks using the sensor's wireless network; the SECs are placed at strategic points on the bridge steel frame to monitor loading resulting from traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%