2017
DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2016.1269607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Visibility of Periodic Flicker

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FVM is computed as shown in Equation 1, however using an empirically determined Minkowski exponent of 2. 1/ as a function of frequency is known as the Temporal Contrast Sensitivity Function (TCSF), and it has not only been measured by us [8], but also by De Lange [5], Kelly [12] and Bodington [13]. The corresponding curves are plotted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Modelling Visibility Of Periodic Flickermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FVM is computed as shown in Equation 1, however using an empirically determined Minkowski exponent of 2. 1/ as a function of frequency is known as the Temporal Contrast Sensitivity Function (TCSF), and it has not only been measured by us [8], but also by De Lange [5], Kelly [12] and Bodington [13]. The corresponding curves are plotted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Modelling Visibility Of Periodic Flickermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimuli of the various light conditions were intermingled and presented in a random order. A similar method was used in the experiments on flicker, the details of which can be found in [8].…”
Section: -1 / M Perzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original P st curve was measured for low luminance adaptation levels, and narrow visual field, which was appropriate for home lighting in the time it was developed. In general lighting of work places adaptation luminance levels are much higher, and visual field involved could be near π steradians [22]. In the case of the high adaptation levels and wider visual field, not only the frequency of maximum sensitivity changes from 8.8 to 15-20 Hz but also sensitivity is higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearization of the IEC flicker sensitivity curve is described in [19], but it is not completely clear if the shift of frequency on the frequency axis was taken into account, since the IEC curve represents sensitivity to voltage changes per time unit, and the IEEE recommended area represents sensitivity to light output modulation as a function of frequency. Research done over the last decade shows that the frequency of maximum observer sensitivity is between 15 and 18 Hz [21,22], or the double frequency of 8.8 Hz, which is used as one of the threshold points of the linearization area based on the IEC curve.…”
Section: Light Flicker In a Steady-state Operation And Gain Factor Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the parameter n can be taken from the literature or it can be determined experimentally. For the conditions used in her experiments, Perz [20] states that: The "measure to predict visibility of periodic flicker for the large visual field, realistic for an office application", is obtained with n = 2. Bodington also uses a quadratic exponent which was determined assuming independence of the frequency components of a complex wave-form [17].…”
Section: Prediction Of Flicker Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%