“…On the flipside, the regulatory agenda may also induce particular disadvantages or “negative spillovers” also overlooked in most quantitative modelling studies (Ciuriak & Singh, , p. 3; Narayanan, Ciuriak, & Singh, , pp. 2–3).…”
Section: Analysing the Impact Of Deep Integration Ptasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Narayanan et al. (, p. 16) upper middle‐income countries like Turkey will encounter modest costs (i.e., negative spillovers) to comply with higher standards set by the mega regionals. For a country in economic development level of Turkey the authors expect 1.65% increase in real labour costs and 0.16% growth in real capital costs by the year 2030 due to higher ecological standards imposed by Trans‐Pacific Partnership and TTIP .…”
Section: Turkey and The Transatlantic Rules Agendamentioning
Policy debate on the implications of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) for Turkey has focused almost exclusively on “how” Turkey can/will take part in a forthcoming transatlantic deal. Turkey's association with a TTIP has largely been conceived as an inevitable and beneficial policy choice to re‐engage Ankara with the Atlantic alliance and emerging transatlantic trade framework. The arguments for extending TTIP to Turkey have mostly been built upon a conventional understanding of preferential trade agreements. The debate has not provided a comprehensive assessment of costs and benefits for Turkey's exclusion from or joining TTIP as it dismissed multiple dimensions of the “deep integration” agenda which underpined the transatlantic talks. This paper intends to contribute to the “why” debate with a thorough analysis of critical issues on the transatlantic agenda by evaluating economic and policy implications of TTIP both for exclusion and association scenarios together with associated compliance and adjustment costs.
“…On the flipside, the regulatory agenda may also induce particular disadvantages or “negative spillovers” also overlooked in most quantitative modelling studies (Ciuriak & Singh, , p. 3; Narayanan, Ciuriak, & Singh, , pp. 2–3).…”
Section: Analysing the Impact Of Deep Integration Ptasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Narayanan et al. (, p. 16) upper middle‐income countries like Turkey will encounter modest costs (i.e., negative spillovers) to comply with higher standards set by the mega regionals. For a country in economic development level of Turkey the authors expect 1.65% increase in real labour costs and 0.16% growth in real capital costs by the year 2030 due to higher ecological standards imposed by Trans‐Pacific Partnership and TTIP .…”
Section: Turkey and The Transatlantic Rules Agendamentioning
Policy debate on the implications of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) for Turkey has focused almost exclusively on “how” Turkey can/will take part in a forthcoming transatlantic deal. Turkey's association with a TTIP has largely been conceived as an inevitable and beneficial policy choice to re‐engage Ankara with the Atlantic alliance and emerging transatlantic trade framework. The arguments for extending TTIP to Turkey have mostly been built upon a conventional understanding of preferential trade agreements. The debate has not provided a comprehensive assessment of costs and benefits for Turkey's exclusion from or joining TTIP as it dismissed multiple dimensions of the “deep integration” agenda which underpined the transatlantic talks. This paper intends to contribute to the “why” debate with a thorough analysis of critical issues on the transatlantic agenda by evaluating economic and policy implications of TTIP both for exclusion and association scenarios together with associated compliance and adjustment costs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.