Quantifying trunk neuromuscular control using seated balancing and stability threshold

Reeves, N. Peter; Celi, Victor Giancarlo Sal y Rosas; Ramadan, Ahmed; Popovich, John M.; Radcliffe, Clark J.; Choi, Jongeun; Cholewicki, Jacek

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110038

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current results were comparable with research on the repeatability of trunk balance tests in healthy population. Reeves et al [15] documented an adjusted ICC of 0.61 Nevertheless, the unsatisfactory reliability may be due to a mixed of patients with and without proprioceptive deficits [4]. Assaiante et al [17] investigated the standing balance performance of participants with AIS on a rotational platform with eyes closed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of a three-dimensional spinal proprioception assessment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Although it is evident that some patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have proprioceptive deficit in peripheral joints, knowledge on the proprioceptive function of the deformed spine is limited. Nonetheless, spinal proprioception in AIS may be affected three-dimensionally, prior studies only focussed on evaluating peripheral proprioception in single plane. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a novel spinal proprioception assessment using three-dimensional motion analysis in patients with AIS. Methods Participants were included if they had a primary diagnosis of AIS who did not receive or failed conservative treatments. Three trunk repositioning tests involving flexion-extension, lateral-flexion, and axial-rotation were conducted. A three-dimensional kinematics of the trunk was used as the outcome measures. The proprioceptive acuity was quantified by the repositioning error. The intra-examiner and test-retest reliability were analysed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Fifty-nine patients with AIS were recruited. Regarding the trunk flexion–extension test, the single measure ICC showed moderate reliability (0.46) and the average measures ICC demonstrated good reliability (0.72). As for the trunk lateral-flexion test, the reliability of single measure and average measures ICC was moderate (0.44) and good (0.70) reliability, respectively. For the trunk axial-rotation test, the single measure ICC indicated fair reliability (0.32), while the average measures ICC showed moderate reliability (0.59). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate the reliability of novel three-dimensional spinal proprioception assessments in patients with AIS. The trunk flexion-extension repositioning test may be preferable clinical test given its highest reliability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%