2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying uncertainty in short-term traffic prediction and its application to optimal staffing plan development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the GCNN models can also be applied to solve other transportation problems that can be represented by graphs such as subway station demand prediction, network traffic state estimation, and so on. Fourth, the GCNN model can be extended to capture uncertainties in predictions (Lin et al, 2018a). Fifth, the GCNN model can be considered as a component in a comprehensive framework for dynamic bike rebalancing.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the GCNN models can also be applied to solve other transportation problems that can be represented by graphs such as subway station demand prediction, network traffic state estimation, and so on. Fourth, the GCNN model can be extended to capture uncertainties in predictions (Lin et al, 2018a). Fifth, the GCNN model can be considered as a component in a comprehensive framework for dynamic bike rebalancing.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GJR-GARCH allows the conditional variance to respond differently to the past negative and positive innovations, which is inspiring for this article. Lin et al [32] used quantile regression to deal with the heteroscedasticity problem, which used asymmetric loss functions for prediction intervals calculation of short-term traffic volume.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true if we consider complex traffic behaviors and heterogeneous data sources that rely on noisy sensors such as the one considered in this article. However, with a few notable exceptions such as Tsekeris & Stathopoulos (2009) and Chen et al (2011), who explore the use of GARCH volatility models, and Lin et al (2018), who consider the direct estimation of prediction intervals, the heteroscedastic treatment of traffic phenomena, like the one proposed in this article, has been studied to a much smaller extent.…”
Section: Heteroscedastic Time-series Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%