2004
DOI: 10.1002/col.10232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying variations in personal color spaces: Are there sex differences in color vision?

Abstract: We report a search for group differences in color experience between male and female subjects, focusing on the relative prominence of the axes of color space. Dissim-ilarity data were collected in the form of triadic (odd-one-out) judgments, made with the caps of the D-15 color deficiency test, with lighting conditions controlled. Multidi-mensional scaling reduced these judgments to a small number of dimensional-weight parameters, describing each sub-ject's sensitivity to color axes, i.e., how much each axis c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
71
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
71
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such methods have also contributed to our knowledge of the functional organization of color vision (Bimler, Kirkland & Jameson, 2004;Gunther & Dobkins, 2003;Burt, 1949;Jones, 1948) and motion perception (Morrone et al, 1999). In addition, individual differences based studies have yielded insights into the functional organization of color vision (Malkoc et al, 2005;Webster et al, 2000aWebster et al, ,b, 2002Pickford, 1951), stereopsis (van Ee & Richards, 2002;van Ee, 2003;Scharff, 1997;Regan et al, 1986;Richards & Lieberman, 1985;Richards & Regan, 1973), and shape from shading (Adams, 2007) without explicitly using latent variable models.…”
Section: Functional Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have also contributed to our knowledge of the functional organization of color vision (Bimler, Kirkland & Jameson, 2004;Gunther & Dobkins, 2003;Burt, 1949;Jones, 1948) and motion perception (Morrone et al, 1999). In addition, individual differences based studies have yielded insights into the functional organization of color vision (Malkoc et al, 2005;Webster et al, 2000aWebster et al, ,b, 2002Pickford, 1951), stereopsis (van Ee & Richards, 2002;van Ee, 2003;Scharff, 1997;Regan et al, 1986;Richards & Lieberman, 1985;Richards & Regan, 1973), and shape from shading (Adams, 2007) without explicitly using latent variable models.…”
Section: Functional Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This is one of the reasons women are considered more capable of matching shades than men are. 1,10,11 It is known that men and women differ in their capacity to distinguish shades, 7,12,13 and traditionally women have been considered better at selecting shades than men. 11,14 The majority of studies have attached little or no importance to the observer's gender at the time of shade selection, even though this is a variable that can influence the end result of the selection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 The majority of studies have attached little or no importance to the observer's gender at the time of shade selection, even though this is a variable that can influence the end result of the selection process. 8,12,13 Another variable to consider in shade matching is the observer's clinical experience, which can alter the capacity to reproduce the matching process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However motivational or preference differences cannot account for the effects due to color or monochrome stimulus presentation. We therefore think it more likely that these effects are due to differences in perceptual acuity associated with gender and age; research suggests that younger people and women have better perceptual acuity than older people and men respectively (Fiorentini et al 1996;Bimler et al 2004), and these differences in perceptual acuity may play an important role in the between-groups differences in quality discrimination observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%