2012
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.28.801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantile Normalization Approach for Liquid Chromatography— Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomic Data from Healthy Human Volunteers

Abstract: In this study, 1-norm, 2-norm, and quantile normalization techniques were evaluated to compare the effects of three different normalization methods on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics data. Experimental Study designThis randomized, single-blind, two-period, two-way crossover study with a 1-week washout period was conducted at the Clinical Trial Center of the Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea (Fig. 1). A total of eight subjects were randomly assig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak extraction and quantification of ion intensities were performed by an adaptive processing software package (apLCMS) designed for use with LC-FTMS data, 26 which provided tables containing m/z values, retention time, and integrated ion intensity for each m/z feature. The data were log-transformed, median centered, scaled to have unit variance, and quantile normalized 27,28 prior to statistical and bioinformatic analyses.…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak extraction and quantification of ion intensities were performed by an adaptive processing software package (apLCMS) designed for use with LC-FTMS data, 26 which provided tables containing m/z values, retention time, and integrated ion intensity for each m/z feature. The data were log-transformed, median centered, scaled to have unit variance, and quantile normalized 27,28 prior to statistical and bioinformatic analyses.…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the intensities of the 1,178 peaks were normalised using a quantile normalization algorithm [55] to remove systematic errors from sample preparations and LC–MS analyses. The peak intensities represent a metabolic phenotype for each sample, which varied among samples and thus represented the individual variation in the plasma metabolome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the test samples was analysed by LC–MS in the positive ionisation mode to obtain metabolite profiles. The analysis involved the following steps: plasma sample preparation, full-scan (50–900 m/z ) LC–MS analysis, data preprocessing, peak detection and alignment (using XCMS software) [52], [53], peak intensity normalization (using the quantile normalization algorithm of the preprocessCore package [54] with R language, version 2.11.1) [55], and the creation of an export annotated peak data table along with unique peak identifiers and normalised peak intensities for further multivariate statistical analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Quantile normalization was also conducted by R for metabolomic data processing. [17] The preprocessed dataset was imported to SIMCA software (version 14, Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) and a multivariate statistical analysis was performed. Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used according to Bylesjö et al [18] Variable importance in the projection (VIP) value was used to account for which metabolite contributed to the alteration after the glimepiride administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%