Background
Accurate evaluation of the invasion depth of tumors with a Vesical Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (VI‐RADS) score of 3 is difficult.
Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strategy based on the integration of the VI‐RADS and tumor contact length (TCL) for the diagnosis of muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Study type
Single center, retrospective.
Subjects
A group of 179 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range, 24.0–96.0) underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before surgery, including 147 (82.1%) males and 32 (17.9%) females. Twenty‐four (13.4%), 90 (50.3%), 43 (24.0%), 15 (8.4%), and 7 (3.9%) cases were Ta, T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively.
Field Strength/Sequence
A 1.5 T and 3.0 T, T2‐weighted turbo spin‐echo (TSE), single‐shot echo‐planar (SS‐EPI), diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and T1‐weighted volumetric interpolated breath‐hold examination (T1‐VIBE).
Assessment
Three radiologists independently graded the VI‐RADS score and measured the TCL on index lesion images. A proposed MRI strategy called VI‐RADS_TCL was introduced by modifying the VI‐RADS score, which was downgraded to VI‐RADS 3F (equal to a VI‐RADS score of 2) if VI‐RADS = 3 and TCL < 3 cm.
Statistical Tests
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Mann–Whitney U test, chi‐square tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and 2 × 2 contingency tables were applied.
Results
Inter‐reader agreement values were 0.941 (95% CI, 0.924–0.955) and 0.934 (95% CI, 0.916–0.948) for the TCL and VI‐RADS score. The TCL was significantly increased in the MIBC group (6.40–6.85 cm) compared with the NMIBC group (1.98–2.45 cm) (P < 0.05). The specificity and positive predictive values (PPV) of VI‐RADS_TCL were 82.46%–87.72% and 90.91%–91.59%, which were significantly greater than VI‐RADS score (P < 0.05). Additionally, 52.17%–55.88% NMIBC lesions with VI‐RADS 3 were downgraded to 3F by using VI‐RADS_TCL.
Data Conclusion
The proposed MRI strategy could reduce the false‐positive rate of lesions with a VI‐RADS score of 3 while retaining sensitivity.
Evidence Level
4
Technical Efficacy
2