Quantitation of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects with the Mark II Friedmann Analyzer

Hicks, Bryan C.; Anderson, Douglas R.

doi:10.1016/0002-9394(83)90390-2

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1983

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[1][2][3] Static perimetry also is better suited than other methods for quantifying visual field defects. [1][2][3] However, kinetic perimetry is useful for evaluating patients with glaucoma without visual field defects within the central 30 4 , if the ophthalmologist is attempting to identify peripheral defects 5,6 , and for patients with intracranial disease. 7,8 Kinetic perimetry is performed manually using Goldmann perimetry.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning Effect and Repeatability of Automated Kinetic Perimetry in Healthy Participants

Hirasawa

Shoji

2014

Current Eye Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The results of the first measurement in the inexperienced participants require careful evaluation, especially for III4e and I4e measured in the peripheral areas. However, because III4e and I4e both showed good repeatability in inexperienced and experienced participants, automated kinetic perimetry may be suitable for measuring the peripheral area using higher stimulus intensities such as III4e and I4e.

show abstract