1979
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/71.5.534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of Hemoglobin A2: An Interlaboratory Study

Abstract: In the 1976 hemoglobinopathy proficiency testing survey of the Center for Disease Control (CDC), whole-blood samples from hematologically normal adults and from individuals heterozygous for beta-thalassemia were shipped to survey participants. The object of this survey was to determine the state of the art for technics used to quantitate hemoglobin A2 (Hb A2) and to test the ability of laboratories to differentiate between blood samples having normal Hb A2 levels and those having elevated levels (i.e., those f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients attended the clinics regularly and their hematological data were generated using routine clinical methods. HbF and HbA 2 were measured by alkali denaturing electrophoresis (9, 10). The presence of HbS was confirmed by acid electrophoresis.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients attended the clinics regularly and their hematological data were generated using routine clinical methods. HbF and HbA 2 were measured by alkali denaturing electrophoresis (9, 10). The presence of HbS was confirmed by acid electrophoresis.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytic methods to quantify HbA 2 include electrophoresis at an alkaline pH, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and tandem mass spectrometry. 2 Studies performed in the 1970s [3][4][5][6] showed poor precision for HbA 2 quantification methods based on electrophoresis. Steinberg and Adams 1 concluded that although electrophoresis at an alkaline pH with densitometric tracings of electrophoretograms for quantification of HbA 2 was an ideal clinical laboratory method from an ease-of-use perspective, it was inaccurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the few data available from external quality assessment schemes on HbA 2 determination by routine laboratories demonstrate that data obtained by different laboratories using the same technique are often quite dispersed (20)(21)(22). Most of the variability is probably due to discrepancies in the calibration of the techniques, although direct evidence about how calibration is performed and which materials are used is hard to ascertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%