2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0231(20000730)14:14<1226::aid-rcm14>3.3.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of peptides and proteins by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using 18O‐labeled internal standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
238
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
238
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, differential techniques that use stable isotope incorporation into peptides should have been employed. 40,41 Nevertheless, MALDI-MS analysis of these protein bands did not reveal qualitative differences for these more intensely stained proteins in the case of supernatant from untreated mitochondria. Hence it is possible that a tBid-dependent release of proteases (such as Omi) partially degrades proteins in the mitochondrial supernatant, resulting in a lesser protein content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, differential techniques that use stable isotope incorporation into peptides should have been employed. 40,41 Nevertheless, MALDI-MS analysis of these protein bands did not reveal qualitative differences for these more intensely stained proteins in the case of supernatant from untreated mitochondria. Hence it is possible that a tBid-dependent release of proteases (such as Omi) partially degrades proteins in the mitochondrial supernatant, resulting in a lesser protein content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques introduce the label in viable cells in cell culture ( 14 N/ 15 N labeling [122] and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC [123,124]). Others introduce the tag at the protein level (isotope-coded affinity tags, ICAT [125]) or peptide level (isobaric peptide tags for relative and absolute quantifi-cation, iTRAQ [126] or 18 O-labeling during tryptic digestion [127]), whereas yet others use a label-free strategy in which quantitative information is extracted from LC-MS (extracted ion current, XIC) or MS/MS data (protein abundance index, PAI) in sequential experiments [128][129][130]. Not all quantitation strategies are efficient for phosphoproteomic studies.…”
Section: Quantitation Strategies For Phosphoproteomic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desiderio and Kai employed enzyme-catalyzed 18 O exchange for the preparation of internal standards for MS-based quantitation of peptides in biological extracts [8]. Mirgorodskaya et al and Stewart et al [9,10] proposed the use of 16 O/ 18 O labeling for MS-based quantitation of proteins; the application of this technique as an effective quantitative solutionbased, shotgun proteomic tool was first reported by Yao et al [5]. Coupling the SDS-PAGEbased quantitative approach with post-digestion 18 O exchange for differential proteomics of protein complexes was first proposed by Bantscheff etal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%