1994
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of rCBF by 99mTc-Hexamethylpropyleneamine Oxime Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Combined with 133Xe CBF

Abstract: Summary: A simple, noninvasive method of measuring CBF that uses single photon emission computed tomog raphy (SPECT) of 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine ox ime ( 99 mTc-HMPAO) and whole-brain CBF obtained by 1 33 Xe clearance technique was developed. SPECT data were normalized to the count density of HMP AO uptake in the whole brain and then converted to the absolute units of CBF by multiplying average CBF in the whole brain obtained by 1 33 Xe. Mean CBF values in healthy volunteers (n = 12) were 49 ± 7 and 30 ±… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 summarizes the results of previous reports obtained by PET, functional CT, and DSC MRI (10,12,14,22,25,27,33,34,37). The results of the present study agree with those results, albeit the variation of the previously reported values is markedly large.…”
Section: Table 1asupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Table 2 summarizes the results of previous reports obtained by PET, functional CT, and DSC MRI (10,12,14,22,25,27,33,34,37). The results of the present study agree with those results, albeit the variation of the previously reported values is markedly large.…”
Section: Table 1asupporting
confidence: 93%
“…PET studies have preferred to use absolute estimates of perfusion (9, 14, 34); in DSC MRI, relative measures (27, 37) and only more recently the absolute estimates (12, 22, 33) have been studied. Table 2 summarizes the results of previous reports obtained by PET, functional CT, and DSC MRI (10, 12, 14, 22, 25, 27, 33, 34, 37). The results of the present study agree with those results, albeit the variation of the previously reported values is markedly large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaling factors were chosen for CBVand CBF on the basis of values reported in the literature for white matter (22,23,34). The range of CBV and CBF values for white matter reported in the literature is considerable, depending upon the imaging technology used, the image resolution and the subject/patient conditions (20,(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40). As in their previous study, the present authors chose a normal white matter CBV of 1% and a CBF of 30 mL/ 100 g/min (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%