2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative AFM analysis of phase separated borosilicate glass surfaces

Abstract: Phase separated borosilicate glass samples were prepared by applying various heat treatments. Using selective chemical etching we performed AFM measurement on the phase separated glass surfaces. A quantitative roughness analysis allowed us to measure precisely the dependence of the characteristic size of the phase domains on heating time and temperature. The experimental measurements are very well described by the theoretically expected scaling laws. Interdiffusion coefficients and activation energy are estima… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fast quench below the glass transition temperature enables one to study the frozen structure in the solid state, thereby extending the variety of available characterization techniques. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy, Raman Scattering and Atomic Force Microscopy have been used to characterize quantitatively phase separation in glasses [27][28][29]. We focus here on the late stage of spinodal decomposition after a deep quench into the unstable region, that produces interconnected structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fast quench below the glass transition temperature enables one to study the frozen structure in the solid state, thereby extending the variety of available characterization techniques. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy, Raman Scattering and Atomic Force Microscopy have been used to characterize quantitatively phase separation in glasses [27][28][29]. We focus here on the late stage of spinodal decomposition after a deep quench into the unstable region, that produces interconnected structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for each thermal treatment conditions), at least 3 AFM images were performed for 4 different scan areas ranging between 500 × 500 nm 2 and 8 × 8 µm 2 .Beyond its imaging ability, AFM has recently been used as a truly quantitative tool to study glass surfaces. It is, for example, possible to obtain a quantitative validation of the description of fused glass surfaces by frozen capillary waves [21] or of the kinetics of phase separation in glasses [20]. In both cases, not only are the expected scaling regimes recovered but the prefactors of the scaling laws can also be extracted and shown to be consistent with the associated physical parameters (diffusivity, interface tension).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the simpler case of plane crack propagation, the roughness exponent characterising the in-plane roughness of the crack front was found to be significantly lower in models (ζ dep H ≃ 0.4) [18,19] than in experiments (ζ H ≃ 0.55) [8].We argue here within that the main reason for the apparent discrepancy between experimental results and scaling predictions of depinning models stems from the dubious status in most experiments of a key hypothesis of the models: a clear separation between the scale of disorder and the scale of measurement. To test this argument, we present results of fracture experiments performed on a series of model heterogeneous brittle materials: phase separated glasses [20]. Thermal treatments of various durations allowed the fine tuning of phase domain sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New insights on phase separation paralleled the emergence of experimental techniques in materials science. Whereas the first kinetic studies were realized in the Fourier space, using light diffusion techniques [31,1], direct access to the morphology of the phases is now possible thanks to imaging techniques such as electronic microscopy [32], atomic force microscopy [21,20], X-ray tomography [33] or atom probe tomography [34,23]. In-situ synchrotron microtomography [35] is a technique of choice for studying microstructure formation [36,37], since it provides both the 3-D microstructure and its topology, and successive snapshots of its evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%