2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative agreement between dynamical rocking curves in ultrafast electron diffraction for x-ray lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach has been used to model precession electron diffraction (PED), 36 and this approach has been employed by others to account for UED beam divergence. 37 Notably, this is a 2D integral and has significant contributions from near-zone orientations, so it will be more expensive to compute and more sensitive to the sampling than 1D integrals for PED which may avoid sampling near the zone axis.…”
Section: Ued Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar approach has been used to model precession electron diffraction (PED), 36 and this approach has been employed by others to account for UED beam divergence. 37 Notably, this is a 2D integral and has significant contributions from near-zone orientations, so it will be more expensive to compute and more sensitive to the sampling than 1D integrals for PED which may avoid sampling near the zone axis.…”
Section: Ued Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(c-ii) . This distribution can be considered as the convolution of the beam angular spread with the sample rippling such that the RMS tilt spread, , is given by is typically on the order of 1 mrad or less for transmission UED setups, 37 and depends on the sample preparation but can be as much as tens of mrad in some cases. 14 …”
Section: Ued Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Note that Bragg peak intensity variations are not a direct result from the plasmonic resonance, but are attributed to the difference in angle of incidence of the beam on the sample from shot to shot. 30 All Bragg peaks exhibit the same time-dependent behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%