2015
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i19/76696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis and Evaluation of RPL with Various Objective Functions for 6LoWPAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their comparable results had shown an effective increase in network lifetime. However, the other standard and default OF of RPL: Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function (MRHOF), is considered better than Objective Function Zero (OF0) [20][21], which was not considered in their study. The other authors in [22] had also proposed Scalable CAOF (SCAOF), and their results had shown improvement in network lifetime and energy efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their comparable results had shown an effective increase in network lifetime. However, the other standard and default OF of RPL: Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function (MRHOF), is considered better than Objective Function Zero (OF0) [20][21], which was not considered in their study. The other authors in [22] had also proposed Scalable CAOF (SCAOF), and their results had shown improvement in network lifetime and energy efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it is worth noting that studies from [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] had thrived for static nodes in RPL, whereas studies from [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] had labored for mobile nodes in RPL but IoT networks. It tends to be gathered that a proactive exploration is needed in the field of RPL considering mobility.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DAG is constructed based on path costs, which are based on the combination of node and link metrics and resource constraints. The node metrics thus far utilized in the literature are the residual energy and hop count, whereas the link-based metrics utilized include the delay, ETX, link quality level (LQL) and throughput (Lamaazi, Benamar, & Jara, 2016;Sharma & Jayavignesh, 2015).…”
Section: Background Of Rplmentioning
confidence: 99%